1. Verdict corner: Subrata Roy’s detention cannot go on endlessly

Verdict corner: Subrata Roy’s detention cannot go on endlessly

Last week’s judgment has made it clear that nothing can be done until the Sahara chief chooses to pay up for the sake of attaining his freedom.

By: | Published: June 24, 2015 12:30 AM

The Sahara saga has had no ending ever since it launched an illegal scheme to raise Rs 24,000 crore from the public. The Sahara group, of late, has hogged the headlines for all wrong reasons, be it “manipulating courts” or non-compliance of court orders to repay small investors, which included cobblers, labourers, artisans, peasants, etc, through an “illegal” optional fully convertible debentures (OFCD) scheme. Its two group companies—Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Ltd and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Ltd—have been in the dock over non-compliance of the Supreme Court orders since 2012.

Spelling no immediate relief for beleaguered Sahara group chief Subrata Roy and its two other directors, the Supreme Court last week set tougher terms for the group to secure the release of its jailed chief, saying the firm must repay the entire R36,000 crore, including interest, it owes to the investors within the next 18 months in nine instalments. If Sahara fails to deposit three instalments, Roy and others will have to go back to prison. The bank guarantee can be encashed in case Sahara defaults in payment of two instalments, consecutively or otherwise. In another stringent condition, Roy, on release from jail, would not be allowed to travel abroad and must mark his presence at the Tilak Marg police station in central Delhi once every fortnight. It, however, allowed Roy to use facilities like the conference room in Tihar Jail to hold negotiations with potential buyers to sell his three luxury hotels—Dream Downtown and The Plaza in New York and Grosvenor House in London—or from the real estate in India to secure his bail.

The necessity of “making the law work” even “compelled” the top court to put Roy behind bars in March last year even though the contempt case still remains pending before it. Justifying the arrest orders passed by Justices KS Radhakrishnan and JS Khehar in March last year, the bench headed by Justice TS Thakur candidly said that the arrest order was indeed “unprecedented but justifiable” (personal liberty) since it is “doing what comes naturally” approach to the problem at hand, which required such a drastic step.

“It is … an unprecedented situation of personal liberty of the three applicants on the one hand vis-a-vis majesty of law and ensuring larger public good, on the other hand. It is this sense of justice, in an unprecedented kind of situation, that has compelled the court to take such an extreme step. It is this legal realism which has compelled the court to adopt an approach which sounds more pragmatic. It is ‘doing what comes naturally’ approach to the problem at hand, which required such a drastic step … this case is a burning example where the true dictate of justice is difficult to discern, and the law needed to come down on the side of practical convenience,” the bench stated last Friday, while maintaining the conditions set in the March 2014 order that the company would require to deposit R10,000 crore (R5,000 crore in cash and balance by way of bank guarantee) with Sebi to secure the release of Roy and others.

It further pointed out that this could be categorised as a case where the law may not provide a definite answer but the guiding principle is that the “avowed objective of rule of law is to ensure that the orders of this court are respected and obeyed.”

“This court was virtually compelled to do so, going by the stubborn attitude of the contemnors (Roy) in taking the orders … for granted, as if those orders were only on paper and were not meant to be complied with,” the bench said.

Things have touched ground zero for Roy as fixing the liability at R36,000 crore has dented Sahara’s previous claims that it had repaid 95% of the amount due to the investors by way of cash. Failure to prove the refund of the amount by Sahara had given rise to an inference that the group had not refunded the amount to the real and genuine subscribers.

So many opportunities were given, showing all that leniency which could be extended—giving desired facilities in jail, lifting attachments in respect of properties chosen by Sahara itself for sale/encumbrances, allowing it to sell its properties that too at a reasonable market price—to enable the contemnors to comply with the court’s orders.

Despite giving all necessary stimulus to enable the Sahara group to raise money, major proposals have run into rough weather and had to be terminated midday for being unsatisfactory, yielding no tangible results.

In the event, the Sahara group has lost comprehensively. The financial and liquidity position of its group companies has been adversely affected and has resulted into mounting liabilities in the form of statutory liabilities, unpaid salary and wages, outstanding and overdue amounts payable to banks, etc.

The only way forward is to discharge the huge liability by depositing the same with the market regulator. Last week’s judgment has made amply clear that nothing can be done now until Roy chooses to pay up for the sake of attaining his own freedom. Detention cannot go on endlessly.


Tags: Subrata Roy
  1. J
    Jyotiswaroop Pandey
    Jan 21, 2016 at 9:53 am
    Fake encounters are also justified in similar vein - to keep criminals in check, irrespective of its lawfulness.
  2. A
    Jun 25, 2015 at 4:54 pm
    yes detention as in this case where it is for the larger good to make the law work is necessary and justifiable and go on as long as it takes to get the bail money eventually ofcourse the court will appoint a receiver to sahara group and sell it to the highest bidder and recoup the monies and use that exemplary step to release subrata roy but the court is giving enough opportunity to roy not to force it to do this even though even the court knows and roy knows too that that is the only step or path left roy is a cheat and money launderer who definitely needs to be in jail he stole 36k crore this detention is future detention of royis legal and justifiable that kind of money can collapse markets buy countries and is indeed perhaps is more than the GDP of soem small countries in this world why dont you journalist just report the story and not to engage in legal analysis which your are not qualified to do anyway who are you to ask whether this detention is justifiable or not
  3. V
    Vishwas Patil
    Jun 24, 2015 at 5:59 pm
    Continuing in jail as SC reluctant to auction the ets. It should have been auctioned long back. What is achieved by keeping Subrato in jail except giving time to work out different schemes? Any one will try his best. No point in blaming him.

Go to Top