1. More restrictions on trucks by SC make clear odd-even isn’t the solution 

More restrictions on trucks by SC make clear odd-even isn’t the solution 

Also disclose emission data for each model as some smaller engines emit as much pollution as larger ones 

By: | New Delhi | Published: January 5, 2016 9:09 PM
Trucks are responsible for 46% and two-wheelers – that Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal has not included in his odd-even scheme – account for a third of emissions. (PTI)

Trucks are responsible for 46% and two-wheelers – that Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal has not included in his odd-even scheme – account for a third of emissions. (PTI)

Not surprisingly, given how the Delhi government has demonized cars, the Supreme Court did not lift the ban on registration of large diesel vehicles in the National Capital Region (NCR), but in asking diesel-car manufacturers for data to back their claims, an important window has been opened for data-driven logic. Even after newer diesel technology, diesel may pollute more than petrol does – that’s why advancing date for better fuel is critical – but auto-makers are arguing that larger engines of some manufacturers pollute as much or even less than some smaller engines. Which is why it must be mandatory for each model of vehicle to make public its emission levels – if the SC still decides to ban larger diesel engines, it has to also ban smaller engines, more so given there are many times more smaller diesel engines in the NCR. Making public the data on each model’s emission will also make it clear that, rather than banning new registrations, it it better to take action on older vehicles which are more polluting and far outnumber the newer ones which, by the virtue of better technology, pollute less.

The fact that the SC has banned entry of trucks into Delhi from another four entry points – it had banned entry from two points earlier – also makes it clear that the solution to Delhi’s pollution problem does not lie in the odd-even solution. Indeed, as the IIT-Kanpur study shows, vehicles contribute just 9% of the PM10 pollution in Delhi – 20% of PM2.5. Within this, trucks are responsible for 46% and two-wheelers – that Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal has not included in his odd-even scheme – account for a third of emissions.

AIR-POLLUTION

With no significant dip in PM 2.5/10 levels (see our page 1 graphic) since the odd-even policy was implemented, at some point Kejriwal needs to explain why he pushed the scheme so aggressively when the IIT-Kanpur report made it clear cars weren’t the real problem, why two-wheelers were left out despite causing more pollution due to their vastly larger population and, more important, how the scheme is to be run when schools are re-opened and the buses seconded from them have to be removed from the fleet available to the general public. Strict monitoring is also required to see the Delhi government meets its commitments on paving roadsides – the largest source of particulate matter pollution – and checking construction-related pollution.

  1. G
    Govind Kumar
    Jan 6, 2016 at 9:43 am
    Kejriwal Ji odd even se aacha hai ki aap Delhi main Reservation khatam kr do...hum pad likh ke aate hai aur job milti hai reservation ke basis pe...aap yea kar do phir dekho, delhi public se jo bologe vo has ke kar karegi....aur plz for god sake...public ho pareshaan karna band kro...vaise bhi sare rules to public ke lie hai he....ameer aadmi yea to cab le lega nahi to dusri car...poultion kya ghata kam hoga
    Reply
    1. M
      madhav
      Jan 6, 2016 at 4:55 pm
      The scheme has definitely helped in traffic management if not anything else. Also, those who react negativity at Delhi government's bold step need to realise that the problem is not only government's to solve, its for all of us to respond and supplement government's efforts with a positive atude.
      Reply
      1. M
        Murthy Suppusamy
        Jan 5, 2016 at 4:10 pm
        Huh ha, welcome to Scientific Data than mythology. It takes the nation's Highest Court to order the Government to collect Scientific Data and ban cars on Pollution Levels than Size levels. It's a shame for the government of the day!. Don't the government have fiduciary duty to measure the pollution level each car model and restrict them if they don't meet certain pre-determined pollution level.? And keep this scientific standard as bench-mark demanding all car manufactures to meet?
        Reply

        Go to Top