|
‘Key
focus for ICICI’s merged entity will be total earnings’
The ICICI-ICICI Bank merger plans announced
last year will bring into reality the universal banking dream
and a change in the way financial services are provided in
India. ICICI Ltd executive director Kalpana Morparia
spoke to Sujata Mody on the implications of the merger
on shareholder value.
What does the ICICI management identify
as critical issues for ensuring a success of the merger?
The idea of the merger is to create an entity that has
the ability to offer the entire gamut of banking and financial
products to various customer classes in India. This also means
that ICICI Ltd will be subject to a different regulatory environment,
ie, one relevant to a banking entity that relies primarily
on savings deposits of individuals and, therefore, has to
bear a very heavy burden in terms of reserve ratios and liquidity
ratios. So there is this trade-off. But we feel that the benefits
from accessing the demand deposit base, even post the CRR
and SLR burden, results in a cheaper mobilisation of funds
as an intermediary compared to a non-bank.
The systemic impact of the merger is that earlier you had
segmented markets allowing players to operate only within
their segment. In such a situation, each segment has a different
regulatory burden imposed on it and a restriction in activity,
thereby giving a sub-optimal solution to the customer.
For instance, if you are selling A product but not B product,
you will price everything on the basis of your A product.
But if you are going to bundle A, B and C products together,
you will track a total profitability of the client and you
can offer a better pricing from a consumer perspective. So
the scale and scope of your entire operations undergoes a
dramatic change and therefore, on a system wide basis, it
brings the very strong niche players into the mainstream of
banking providing the entire gamut of services.
When we announced the merger, we took full cognisance of the
current rules applicable to a bank with which we are willing
to comply even if it means compliance on a historic book.
In so far as priority sector is concerned, we knew that there
is a new emerging scenario in the entire priority sector.
So we have asked for a more flexible approach towards priority
sector lending. Otherwise, we are saying that we will comply.
In the interim, we might need some time periods to comply
with requirements like 30 per cent equity holdings in a company,
etc.
What kind of merged entity will the investors have a stake
in?
It will be, very clearly, a technology-enabled banking entity
in India operating across the entire gamut of the customer
segment. From large infrastructure projects, that are capital
intensive, all the way upto someone who wants to buy a refrigerator.
That does not mean that we will be a bank for everybody. It
means that we have an ability to provide all services after
which we will do the customer segmentation in terms of profitability,
etc.
At the time of announcing the merger, the management had
indicated that the first few years post merger could see reduced
earnings. Could you elaborate on the reasons for such a concern?
We had said that we would need to do a catch up on our
existing liabilities which did not attract a regulatory burden
linked to demand deposits as we had bond issuances.
Incremental money that we are raising is going towards Government
of India securities. To that extent, the yield is lowered
but the risk is also much lower since it is government paper.
So in the near term, we will have a profit impact.
Medium and long-term benefits will be shareholder value accretive.
One of the principal reasons is that as a banking entity,
we have an ability to participate in fee and commission services
in terms of remittances, cash management, trade finance that
could not be done by a non-bank. Whereas our bank could have
done it but it had too small a size to be a really meaningful
player. So the contribution of the fees and commission will
be a great value addition to the profit and loss account.
What is the growth forecast post merger?
The way we are now looking at growth, we are not focussing
so much on asset growth. The traditional way of doing banking
business was to hold the asset that you took on your books
till maturity. That’s no longer the case. Our belief is in
the financial services sector.
There will be a set of players having skill sets in originating
business, whether it’s with a corporate loan, a project loan,
infrastructure funding or a consumer loan receivable.
There will be a set of financial players who will be great
mobilisers of savings, but not having great origination capabilities,
who, in turn, have an appetite to buy assets.
Today it is feasible to find a marriage between these two
so as to transfer loans that have been originated, matured
and nurtured for a while through the securitisation route.
Our key focus will be in terms of total returns that we are
giving to the shareholders, total returns that we are earning
from the client, rather than asset growth, which will be incidental
to that. The key driver really will be the earnings.
How will the merger enhance shareholder value?
One of the biggest benefits is that the merged entity will
be able to tap the fee and commission market, which is a Rs
10,000 crore market in India.
The second thing is that it gives both sets of shareholders
an access to the benefits that each entity had.
The bank had access to a low cost deposit base but a large
part of the talent pool on the retail asset side was situated
in ICICI Ltd. ICICI Ltd had capabilities in structuring but
its funding cost was much more expensive than the bank.
ICICI Ltd spawned a whole lot of subsidiaries in insurance,
investment banking, etc, which will now be accessible to the
bank shareholders. Within what timeframe will the investors
reap the benefits of the merger?
The way I see it is once the merger is completed, in the
very first year of performance of the merged entity, they
will clearly be able to see the benefits and that will get
reflected on the share prices.
|