|
In
search of a friendlier India
N Chandra Mohan
Did India find any love in Tokyo? Not much,
would be the response of Japan-watchers. But Prime Minister
Atal Behari Vajpayee and his entourage did return in an upbeat
mood after their five-day state visit. The delegation appeared
bowled over by the charismatic Japanese Prime Minister, Junichiro
Koizumi, and his foreign
minister Makiko Tanaka. The glow in their faces was also because
they had put the bilateral economic relationship back on track.
This relationship was derailed after India’s
nuclear tests in 1998 and the subsequent imposition of sanctions
by Japan. Naturally, with the lifting of sanctions and the
imminent resumption of Japan’s official development assistance,
there will be greater “synergies” between such aid and India’s
development needs. But the upbeat mood reflected India’s successful
pitch for Japanese foreign direct investments. The masterstroke
in this regard was disinvestment minister Arun Shourie’s China
card.
India’s officialdom believes that Japanese businessmen are
paying renewed attention to our country as a possible counter
to China’s rise. Mr Shourie used the Japanese unease regarding
the fiery dragon to hammer home India’s requirement for more
FDI: “You are not strengthening a potential rival when you
invest in India”. By investing instead in China, Japanese
businessmen need to consider “whether they were not creating
a potential problem”, argued the articulate minister.
However, the minister doesn’t realise that Japanese don’t
invest where they are not comfortable. India indeed happens
to be one country where they are not comfortable. To get an
idea regarding this, observe them at the Japan Airlines lounge
in Delhi airport before they emplane homewards. The relief
on their faces is palpable, as they clutch their mandatory
gift packages of Indian “Kocha” tea and impatiently await
the boarding call. It is obvious that they are keen to get
the hell out of this country ASAP.
India is a punishment posting for most Japanese expatriates.
But why are they so uncomfortable here? The country’s vastness.
The heat and dust. The grinding poverty. The regional and
linguistic diversity—all of which does challenge those who
come from smaller and more homogeneous societies. “You must
make India a better place for the Japanese to live in,” said
N Kawamoto, chairman of the Indo-Japanese Business Cooperation
Committee to the visiting Indian delegation last week.
Mr Kawamoto knows what he is talking about. He is a former
head of Honda Motors, which has a major presence in India.
There are only five specialised Japanese restaurants in the
country as a whole, according to him. That fact alone tells
a tale of its own. Japanese prefer to eat their own cuisine:
their sushi, sashimi and sake is simply unavailable in India.
Until recently, most expatriates undertook shopping expeditions
to Kathmandu or Bangkok to stock up on their choice delicacies,
including tuna fish.
Mr Shourie should realise that the discomfort of expatriates
is the worst publicity for Japanese FDI in India. Such investments
amounted to a paltry $156 million last year, working out to
only 8 per cent of total actual FDI inflows into the country.
Japanese investments in India are less than 3 per cent of
their entire Asian exposure. The amount that the Japanese
are ploughing into China in a single year is much higher than
what they have cumulatively invested in India since 1991.
The Japanese discomfort regarding India also arises from the
“troika of obstacles” comprising poor infrastructure, redtapism
among the bureaucracy and the aggressive stance of tax authorities
both at the centre and the states. “I hope the understanding
is reached that FDI is like precious ducks, which lays golden
eggs. If you squeeze them prematurely, you would lose the
geese and the eggs that will be produced,” stated Japanese
envoy in India Hiroshi Hirabayashi to The Financial
Express.
Japanese businessmen are put off by the “troika of obstacles”,
which makes then somewhat cynical of operating from India.
Quite a few have cut their losses and quit India. There are
currently 220 odd major Japanese companies with offices and
plants here, “but it remains peanuts compared to what we are
doing in China and South East Asia”, added Mr Hirabayashi.
There is also an interesting north-south contrast to their
presence in India, with a distinct preference for the south
of Vindhyas in recent years.
More than 60 per cent of the Japanese companies thus operate
from south India, with a major presence in metros like Mumbai,
Pune, Chennai and Bangalore. The friendlier investment climate
in states like Karnataka, Chennai and Maharashtra clearly
have attracted more and more Japanese businesses. By contrast,
their presence in north India is dominated by Delhi and Gurgaon—reflecting
perhaps the solo success story of Maruti Udyog Ltd which was
set up in the early 1980s.
What Maruti did for Japanese FDI in north India, Toyota bids
fair to do the same in south India. The car giant has systematically
set up its own industrial park for its suppliers and sub-contractors.
Its venture to make the Qualis has clicked and the company
plans to launch more models in the passenger car segment.
Toyota’s presence in Karnataka is a tribute to the farsighted
approach of Karnataka’s chief minister and officialdom—surely
a model that deserves to be emulated by other states in India.
If there are more such success stories like Toyota, the decks
are bound to be cleared for more Japanese investments. There
is no need for high profile delegations to visit Tokyo to
invite FDI. They will come on their own, if their self-interest
so warrants it.
That’s why they are in China in a big way. Potential rivalry
is far from their minds. If we need their FDI, the government
must get its act together to make India a more attractive
investment destination.
Providing better infrastructure in the form of better roads,
power and ports should assume paramount importance. Till such
time, there will be not much love from Tokyo. Or Washington
or Bonn or Paris or London for that matter.
|