|
Raising
a stink
Unwarranted ban on urea
exports
Fertiliser manufacturers are up in arms against the government.
With sound reason. The government, vide a notification dated
March 22, had allowed fertiliser manufacturers to export urea
produced by utilising capacity in excess of 100 per cent.
Accordingly, fertiliser companies had chalked out plans to
export urea to neighbouring countries. Now, the government
has slapped a blanket ban on urea exports. The ban could have
its roots in the fear of a deficit in indigenous production,
but ground realities do not bear this concern out. Urea stocks
on the ground stand at a comfortable 20.4 lakh tonne — Uttar
Pradesh alone has four lakh tonne. For the first six months
of the current year, total sale of urea stood at 94 lakh tonne
against a cumulative supply of 116 lakh tonne. Earlier this
month, the Department of Fertilisers fixed the target of urea
production for the next six months at 102.8 lakh tonne and
likely imports of one lakh tonne, or an aggregate availability
of 124.2 lakh tonne for Rabi 2001. Juxtapose this with actual
consumption levels in Rabi 2000 of 96 lakh tonne or in Rabi
1999 of 100 lakh tonne, and one can envisage an exportable
surplus after the industry meets requirements under the Essential
Commodities Act.
In addition to this, if the government does need to revise
upwards its production targets, it can do so. Indeed, the
Department of Fertilisers retains the flexibility to prod
manufacturers to raise production, as and when required. Producers
would have responded without hurting their export efforts.
Having dangled the carrot of exports, it is unfortunate that
the government has applied the brakes now. It will be very
painful for producers to go back on production plans. Indeed,
fertiliser majors like the Indo-Gulf Corporation, Tata Chemicals,
Iffco, etc will be adversely affected. The government ought
to have considered all measures to balance indigenous demand
and supply positions before rushing into imposing a blanket
ban. Exports should be banned only as a last resort, and that
too on a selective basis.
|