The Financial Express
 
 
 
   NEWS
 
  Home
  eFe
  Money & Banking
  Economy
  Corporate
  Investor
  News
  Editorials & Analysis
  Letters to the Editor
    GROUP SITES
 
  Expressindia
  The Indian Express
  Screen
  Latest News
  Kashmir Live
  Loksatta
  Express Computer
 COMMUNITY New!
 
  Message Board
 SUBSCRIPTIONS
 
  Free Newsletter
  Express North
American Edition
  FE ARCHIVE New!
    Search by Date
 

 

 
   LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Thursday, October 18, 2001 

Compromise route is sensible
This refers to the news items ‘RBI panel on defaulters to submit report soon’ (Oct 13) and ‘NBFCs seek access to DRT route to recover NPAs’(Oct 12). It is informed that under the One Time Settlement scheme, over 6.5 lakh accounts involving nearly Rs 3,500 crore have been settled through the compromise route.
Further it is stated that Rs 2,585 crore was being recovered through debt recovery tribunals. Thus, major recoveries have been through the OTS and the impact of the DRTs has only been to create pressure. The real performance of the DRTs cannot be otherwise.
After all, the judicial process, howsoever expeditious, has its limitations. More so, when the defendant/borrowers are increasingly aware about the scope of their rights to defence with the application of the law of torts in the areas of counterclaim and setoffs.
Sensing the same, the banking bureaucracy has rightly concluded that banks would continue to explore the compromise route for settlement of dues under their normal policy. The best recovery is out of the profits generated from running businesses.
Market forces ie continuously falling credit deposit ratios will force banks to help their wealth producing borrowers in all possible ways. That would be better than either OTS or DRT. The added benefit would be gainful utilisation of existing resources, prevention of unemployment and wealth generation.
— Ram Kishan, on e-mail


SingTel’s ties
With reference to the article ‘SingTel says customer choice will have priority over Bharti’ (Oct 10), we are very disappointed with the emotive headline and the tone of the article, which do not accurately reflect the state of SingTel’s relations with the Bharti Group.
SingTel would like to state on record that our ties with Bharti are strong. We are working with Bharti to jointly construct the Singapore-India i21 submarine network, which is targeted for service by the first quarter next year.
SingTel is also fully supportive of Bharti’s plans to grow its cellular and fixed line businesses. Our investment of $650 mn to date reflects out strong commitment to Bharti.
With regard to SingTel’s plans for internet data centres in India, SingTel has been in discussions with Bharti for possible collaboration.
If SingTel and Bharti do not collaborate in this area, it does not mean that the interests of the two parties are not aligned. Unfortunately, your writer seems to have drawn this conclusion.
— Francis Huan, Corporate Communications

SingTel
Our correspondent replies:
1. SingTel has several streams of business development in India, including data centres and an existing relationship with VSNL.
2. Some of these businesses don’t fall into Bharti’s gameplan. Therefore, SingTel has decided to follow the customer, rather than stay away from those businesses.
3. This point will guide their expansion in India, particularly in the post April 1 scenario.
4. Their relationship with Bharti is something we have not questioned. Instead, we have quoted them on other businesses, a fact they haven’t questioned in this letter.

Time to go
The bold decision of the trustees of Unit Trust of India to reduce the retirement age for its employees from 60 years to 58 years deserves appreciation. It is worth emulating by other government and public sector undertakings with a view to reduce the dead wood and create employment for the meritorious, talented and dynamic youth of the country.
Instead of introducing voluntary retirement schemes at huge public expense, it is better to reduce the workforce via the reduction of retirement age from the present 60 years to the erstwhile 55 years, at the earliest.
— N P Kumar, on e-mail
 
Write to the Editor
Mail this story
Print this story
 
 
 
   
 
About Us | Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback
© 2001: Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd. All rights reserved throughout the world.