|
Commodity
futures at crossroads as government seen changing tack
Sharad
Mistry
Mumbai, July 15: Traders in commodity futures market
once again find themselves at the cross- roads as they feel
the government is changing tack and rules of the game. What
is more, the commodity futures markets regulator Forward Markets
Commission (FMC) too seems to be relatively unconcerned of
the “unhealthy” practices going on at the various comexes,
especially and recently at the National Board of Trade (NBoT),
Indore.
While the deliberations at the recently concluded meet of
president of commodity exchanges in New Delhi have hardly
been made public, the FMC and the other officials of the ministry
of consumer affairs were said to be of the opinion that any
commodity exchange should be given the permission to trade
in any commodity without any restrictions.
“Following the stringent rules is hardly of any concern, and
the fittest and with maximum volumes will survive”, said informed
sources. “This shows that the government and its officials
are not clear of what they want to do in the commodity futures
markets, especially after the near-total absence of the proposed
National Commodity Exchange”.
While the FMC said the NCE proposal is still under consideration,
sources say it has died prematurely.
According to commodity traders here the government now seems
to be desperately wanting large volumes on the comexes to
grant permission for trading in futures in more or new commodities.
Earlier, before giving such permission, the government had
asked the prospective comex candidates to set up clearing
house (to guarantee each trades on the exchange), to install
online/electronic trading and levy stiff upfront margins before
granting permission to trade in commodity futures.
The recent example is that of the Rajkot Seeds, Oil and Bullion
Merchants’ Association which on Friday was granted permission
to trade in futures of eight commodities. These are groundnut
seeds, its oil and deoiled cakes; cottonseed, its oil and
deoiled cake; palmolien and cotton.
While formally the government has asked the exchange authorities
to comply with FMC conditions within six months of receiving
the permission, industry sources here say that the government’s
main concern is lack of volumes on the existing comexes. That
the volumes are low on the comexes because of these stringent
requirements is a different story.
What is more disturbing is that the closing of deals at prices
unrelated to market prices to safeguard interests of powerful
persons on comexes — a practice that was followed frequently
by stock-brokers on the stock exchanges — has lately emerged
on commodity exchanges.
Last Friday, the board of National Board of Trade (formerly
Sopa Board of Trade) dealing in soya futures, announced closing
of all deals in August 2001 contracts at Rs 305, against the
market price of around Rs 340.
Informed traders here say, the reason NBoT chose to settle
trades lower, is that the exchange’s president “was on the
wrong side of the market. His losses combined with trades
in Malaysia, Chicago and Indore come to a stupendous figure
(unconfirmed Rs 450 crore). FMC cannot sleep over this kind
of operation”.
The permission to Bombay Commodity Exchange Ltd was granted
on the condition that it will have: 1) computerised trading
2) set up independent clearing corporation 3) levy up-front
margining system.
“It seems, no other commodity exchange has been forced to
act on any of these above given conditions, while granting
permission to trade in commodity futures”, said a BCE source.
“Further, Rajkot has received the permission to trade in all
competitive commodities without any infrastructural facilities.
The question remains is whether the government measures success
of comex in terms of volumes or technology?” the source asked.
It is no secret that commodity futures at both Ahmedabad and
Rajkot commodity exchanges are way away from normally accepted
trade principles. “If we at the BCE are allowed to trade in
the fashion it takes place in Rajkot or Ahmedabad or Indore,
we could also be successful in showing large volumes. But
is this what the government wants the comexes to resort to?”
|