| EDITORIAL |
| |
|
The
gathering clouds
Too many
negative voices on the economy
The plot indeed
thickens on India’s economic front. A pessimistic outlook for the
second decade of its reforms by a leading international magazine,
The Economist, and a downgrade of the country’s ratings outlook
by Fitch add to the onset of gloom over recent performance. While
reforms since 1991 resulted in faster growth and improved the balance
of payments, the second decade of reforms began on a dull note:
growth slowed to less than 6 per cent last fiscal. A series of scandals
intensified the crisis of governance. The dismantling of quantitative
restrictions has “spooked” India’s farmers and industrialists. And
the end game has begun for the saga of the Dabhol Power Company
versus Maharashtra’s electricity board — which is sending out signals
that India is not serious about power sector reform. The government
nevertheless hopes to raise growth to 8 per cent and attract FDI
of $10bn, up from $2bn now. But these targets are not easy: they
entail raising investment from 25 per cent to 38 per cent of GDP
and policies that “rekindle the excitement of the early 1990s”,
to borrow an expression from The Economist.
Nowhere is this
more evident than on the fiscal front. The combined deficit of the
centre and the states is 10 per cent of GDP, hardly different from
the early 1990s. Failure to address such fiscal imbalances resulted
in the change in India’s rating from stable to negative by Fitch.
The latest official numbers also point to a slippage from budgetary
targets for 2001-2002: the government’s borrowings in April-May
work out to more than half of the target for the fiscal. Thanks
to this binge, real interest rates remain high; resources are crowded
out for private investment and a stop-go growth cycle has been triggered.
Last fiscal, the centre’s fiscal deficit was limited to 5.2 per
cent of GDP through cuts in spending. This is bad news for raising
growth, as plan capital expenditures were slashed. Additional resources
will be available for such expenditures only if revenue deficits
are controlled — but this is not happening. This implies recourse
to more borrowings, pushing the fisc deeper into an internal debt
trap. It is time for serious stocktaking, not for quibbling on judgements,
however pessimistic.
|
| |
|
|
| |