| Clearing
Corporation forms panels to work out organisational structure
Sujoy Manna
|
MAKING
IT CLEAR
|
- Committees
to comprise mostly of the directors of
clearing house
- Expected
to submit the reports by September this year
- To
offload 49% stake to broaden shareholding pattern
- To
decide on the member admission fees, norms for
additional shareholders, and risk management system
|
Mumbai, June
2: Clearing Corporation of India Ltd (CCIL) has set up three
committees to work out the modalities for various operational and
organisational structures amongst others. The three committees,
comprising mostly of the directors of the clearing house, are expected
to submit the reports by September this year.
Of this, one
committee is expected to work out the modalities of farming out
49 per cent of the corporation’s equity to market players including
primary dealers. The intention is to broaden the shareholding pattern.
Currently, only six entities — State Bank of India, ICICI, IDBI,
LIC, Bank of Baroda and HDFC — have subscribed to 51 per cent of
the total corpus of Rs 50 crore.
Speaking to
The Financial Express, CCIL managing director MR Ramesh said, “The
internal committees are working on various operational areas like
deciding on the member admission fees, norms for additional shareholders,
risk management system, norms for setting up the settlement guarantee
fund apart from organisational infrastructure issues.”
At present,
only institutions are eligible to become members of the clearing
corporation. The committee would work out norms whereby other entities
can also become members. This would be decided on the basis of financial
and operational parameters like capital adequacy, size of the operation
and prevailing risk management system.
The committee
on system and other areas would consider the risk management system
that would come in place. It is expected to replicate the risk management
system that is prevailing at National Securities Clearing Corporation
(NSCCL) with required modifications, which is the clearing house
for the equity market. The committee is to decide on the various
margining requirements along with the norms for settlement guarantee
funds.
The margining
requirements would secure the potential credit exposure through
collaterals. The methodology adopted to measure the potential loss
is of crucial importance. Frequency of settlement is also a factor
that impacts margin requirement.
The major risks
in the securities clearing and settlement system are credit risk,
liquidity risk and operational risk. Credit risk can be of two types.
The principal risk — where the seller delivered the security but
not received payment or the buyer has made payment but not received
the scrip. Such principal risk is eliminated through the use of
the delivery versus payment (DVP) mechanism. This ensures that delivery
is made only if payment takes place.
In a guaranteed
settlement where the clearing house is the central counter party,
the principal risk is transferred to the clearing house. The credit
risk occurs when one party fails to perform his part of the contract.
|