| EDITORIAL |
| |
|
Slippery
in Kuala Lumpur
Palmoil dominates the relationship
The Prime Minister, Mr Vajpayee’s recent sojourn to Malaysia has
come a cropper. Such harsh comment is inescapable, for the nation’s
chief executive has returned virtually empty-handed. The visit did
not yield anything tangible on the two things of primary concern
to New Delhi: Ottavio Quattrocchi’s extradition remains as elusive
as before and little could be achieved in terms of reining in the
growing influence of Pakistan in the region, which was important
in the context of Malaysia’s presidency of the Organisation of Islamic
Conference (OIC). Mr Quattrocchi’s extradition is reportedly tangled
in technical and legal issues. And there is nothing to crow about
Malaysia going beyond appreciating India’s views on its immediate
neighbour, which was on entirely predictable lines. Malaysia, for
its part, has a single-point agenda to push for with New Delhi,
a fact itself indicative of the thinness of the bilateral relationship.
India is the largest importer of palm oil from Malaysia, and Kuala
Lumpur urged India to facilitate larger imports. India did indeed
almost announce an import duty cut from 75 to 65 per cent but Mr
Vajpayee pulled back from the brink to tell his interlocutors that
a final decision would be taken after wider consultations at home.
The last word on this is not yet out and there is a possibility
of a duty cut, if only to placate Malaysia.
That may be no bad thing for the consumer but it means that the
Kerala edible oils lobby will be up in arms. Memories of protests
by Kerala traders when imported palmolein was poured out in the
streets are still fresh and must have had a sobering effect on the
Indian delegation. On the business side, Malaysia awarding the Rs
8,500-crore railway contract to Ircon is certainly significant,
even if payment is to be settled through palm-oil purchases. So
is the case with India’s offer of GSLV facilities, or the two countries
joining hands to put in place several mechanisms including the joint
commission and the defence committee. Mahathir Mohammed is a shrewd
politician with strong business acumen. The prime minister might
have been wise to include in his entourage men like Andhra Pradesh
Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu, who has a good working equation
with the Malaysian premier and might have coaxed out more from the
Malaysian side.
|
| |
|
|
| |