| EDITORIAL |
| |
|
A
legitimate query
Please say how quake contributions were spent
The Japanese Ambassador has raised a very pertinent question in
demanding of the government an audited statement on how it utilised
the Rs 25 crore given by Tokyo to the Primer Minister’s Relief Fund.
He said this was the Japanese taxpayers’ money made over for the
noble cause of mitigating the suffering of the victims of the Gujarat
earthquake. As such, his government had every right to know the
manner in which the sum was expended. He is right. The response
of the prime minister’s office, that contributions to the PM’s Relief
Fund are not subject to audit and the government is not duty-bound
to make the details public, holds no water. When there is a straightforward
demand for details, why take shelter in the fact that there is no
precedent? If anything, the government should come out, of its own
accord, with a full-fledged report, complete with details of donations
from the international community and even corporate bodies and their
utilisation. If there is nothing to hide, let it not be hidden.
Let there be full-scale transparency.
The world stood by India when calamity struck in Gujarat. Help,
in money and materials, poured in and commendable work was done
by national and international voluntary organisations. The government’s
own response was better than it has been in the past to similar
calamities. But note that there still is no national disaster management.
As with all calamities in India, this one made the headlines for
a while and it looked as if safety norms would be enforced in the
future — and then new headlines replaced Gujarat. Reports fly in
the face of claims that rehabilitation work is in full swing. There
are complaints that relief materials did not reach the affected,
and many still live perilously exposed to the elements. Perhaps
it was this which prompted the Japanese diplomat to seek details.
The government did acquit itself better in tackling the disaster
than in the case of the Latur quake. Now, if there is no transparent
accounting, not only will the international community think before
offering financial aid to this country in a future disaster, Indian
citizens will themselves be inhibited: what hope for an assurance
that their money would be well spent if even governments have no
guarantee?
|
| |
|
|
| |