Tuesday, December 19, 2000
fesub.gif (4328 bytes)
Full Story
fe.gif (834 bytes)
India's first e-business paper
flnews.gif (5153 bytes)
Search FE
-
Download
BSE Quotes
NSE Quotes
-
Think Tank
This week we focus on a complete analysis of the
industry
-
 

Integrate small with large rather than divide 

GP Goenka  
A lot of good things have happened for the Indian consumer. Prices are down, quality has improved and variety is up. Whilst a lot of good things have happened for the Indian consumer, I wish I could say the same thing about the Indian producer, the Indian manufacturer whether in the large, medium or the small scale sector. Producers of goods in India are not half as happy as the consumers. Production is as important as consumption.

If one does not balance the other ultimately, the effects on the country would be reminiscent of colonial exploitation; of India's surpluses flowing out to the rest of the world without a commensurate flow of profit to the Indian economy. None of us here in this major gathering of Indian business is against liberalisation. In fact, with one voice we are prepared to say that we are positively for liberalisation, for reforms, for more interaction with the business and technology of all countries of the world. What we now plead is for a single standard, for what has often been talked about as a level playing field. Let it not happen that we ever feel like a walnut in the nutcracker or, in our Indian metaphor, like a supari under the blade of a sarota, wherein prices continually fall but costs constantly rise.

On behalf of everyone in Indian business, let me offer gratitude to the Vajpayee government's intervention in stemming the rising tide of unfair, or even illegal imports, some called dumping, some described as undercutting and some of it unadulterated smuggling. We are also glad that the government has persuaded Beijing to try and stop the outflow of goods to India in an illegitimate manner. In fact, India, China and Nepal must build a strong and inalienable Asian partnership as we step into the Asian century. But, there are several other areas where threats menace Indian Industry. For example, the cost of electricity is getting prohibitive, which is 10 to 11 cents in India against 3-5 cents abroad.

In Gujarat, the pride of our industrial advance, thousands of businessmen and industrialists, small and big, are together agitating against a power tariff which will be unbearable. The proverbial inspector raj is only one example whereby production as well as productivity is interfered with very often for private gratification. The situation became serious because prices of Indian goods have to be in line with the lowest level of international prices. But costs are dictated by domestic circumstances like the high cost of power, whether electrical or manpower. The cost of borrowing money, whether for capital investment or for working funds, is probably the highest in the world. I make a few unconventional suggestions after taking into serious consideration the political climate of our nation.

The nation is of the unviability of cross subsidy in the realm of electrical power. Industry is overcharged to offer free power to the rural sector - power that is both intermittent and of poor quality. We suggest that the government start a grand experiment by offering top quality and undisturbed power to clusters of farmers who agree to install meters and pay user charges. We are convinced that thousands of village clusters would come forward voluntarily to avail guaranteed uninterrupted supply at regular voltage in return for user charges. Similarly, power distribution to all industrial clusters and in select cities be left in private hands expeditiously. With this, the theft of power will radically come down and so would transmission losses over time. These two pilot reforms could finally break the political lock jam and transform the Indian power matrix.

As for the complicated case of reforming India's industrial relations, we propose a pilot which could ultimately set the pace of change. Cheap labour was supposed to be a great competitive strength of Indian Industry. It is no longer so. True, the poorest worker is extremely poor. But the same cannot be said of organised labour which, in many areas, has become expensive without a commensurate rise in productivity. A young friend of mine recently visited a factory, three hours drive from Shanghai. There he saw one worker supervising as many as three automatic machines. His working shift was 12 hours and the only day off was the last day of the month. He did not even have the benefit of a weekly holiday despite his 12 hour shift. I am not suggesting that in India we run sweat shops. Certainly not. But ways and means have to be found so that we can stand up and compete rupee for rupee, paise for paise in the markets of the world. Can contract labour with much higher wages be given a trial only in SpecialEconomic Zones set up by the government?

One of the causes of the current industrial slowdown is the poor and wildly fluctuating growth rate of the agricultural sector. The Vajpayee government's focus on radical agricultural reforms and all-out encouragement of agri-business is not only good economics, but good politics as well. I have a few suggestions:

  • Remove the stocking limits of agricultural commodities by amending the Essential Commodities Act. When FCI is itself burdened with unmanageable stocks of foodgrains, there is no justification for continuing with the draconian measures against traders.

  • Remove the ban on futures trading.

  • Allow free flow of goods from Kanyakumari to Kashmir.

  • Allow free use of wasteland without any restrictions on land holding in order to promote economy of scale.

    We have a massive distribution network of commercial banks, regional rural banks and even co-operatives. Yet 40-50% of the credit required by the farmers is met by informal sector at interest rates which are known to be double and triple of the formal institutional system. What prevents us from making the grain dealers, tractor dealers, fertiliser dealers, moneylenders and non-banking financial intermediaries as the credit extension service to the farmers. Ficci recommends that let Nabard refinance these agencies and release the forces of massive competition among multiple agents to the advantage of the farmer.

    It is disturbing to learn that over Rs 50,000 crore of agricultural produce is wasted today - six times that of the annual food subsidy of our nation. Obviously, agri-processing is the answer to the future. This sector has an employment elasticity of two to four times that of other manufacturing. I have a few suggestions for the government's consideration:

  • Encourage and facilitate industry to enter into direct contract with farmers for procurement of their raw material.

  • Create four-way alliances - farmers, suppliers, food processors and credit or insurance suppliers.

  • Create an alliance of infrastructure to improve efficiency between grain handling equipment, transporters and storage silos.

  • Integrate food and consumer laws to avoid multiple legislation and multiple regulatory authorities, and harmonise these with international requirements.

  • Lower excise and other taxes on processed food products to expand markets, stimulate employment and as past experience shows, even increase total revenue.

    In a world that is globalising at a rapid rate. Indian agricultural produce is bound to have a significant price advantage, considering the varied climatic and soil conditions, and the vast gene pools in India.

    The vitality of the nation at the grassroot level is defined by the state of the small scale industries. It is paradoxical that barring 700 odd items which are still under import licensing and will exit by March 31, all other items can be imported into our country today, inclusive of those which are under small scale reservation. In other words, a finished product or an input from an MNC abroad can be patronised by the Indian consumer, but not the same item from medium and large Indian industries. We urge the government to make empowering of the small scale industry a mission through every impossible means. Ficci is ready to lock shoulders with the government in the manner in which Japan did through it system of Keiretsu and Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia did by encouraging the integration of small with large rather than dividing them forever.

    (Excerpted from the welcome address to the 73rd annual session of Ficci, held in New Delhi on December 16 and 17, 2000)

    Copyright © 2000 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.

  • - Lead Stories | Corporate | Infrastructure | Commodities | Economy/Finance | BSE Today | NSE/ Markets | Strategy | Convergence | After Hours top.gif (150 bytes)Top
    flame.jpg (1068 bytes) © Copyright 1999: Indian Express Newspaper(Bombay) Ltd. All rights reserved throughout the world.
    This entire edition is compiled in Mumbai by The Indian Express Online Media Limited, a division of
    The Indian Express Group of Newspapers. Managed by The Indian Express Online Media Limited and hosted by CerfNet.