



Mumbai: the World Bank on this issue and we completely disagree that we are guilty of doing anything wrong. It was an SEC approved scheme and we offered it to many of our clients as a gesture,” Paranjpe added.
“We sold the shares to individuals through investment bankers and we don’t know what their internal policies are,” he said, referring to conflict of interest issues.
According to Paranjpe, the impact of this event would not be significant as Wipro’s cumulative revenues from the World Bank in the last eight years was less than $ 1 million.
According to the Wipro statement, “To date, Wipro’s revenue from the World Bank is insignificant. Our inability to get future business from the World Bank will not adversely affect our business and results of operations.”
Experts don’t see a large impact of this on the industry going forward. Says Nasscom chairman Ganesh Natarajan, “Since Wipro did not feel that it was a significant development, it didn’t come out with a clarification before. However, now that the World Bank has made its disclosure, Wipro has too. We hope there will be no impact on the industry going ahead.
WORLD BANK WOES
Wipro Technologies
Term: 4 years
Imposed: June 2007
Reason: Providing improper benefits to Bank staff
Satyam Computer Services Ltd
Term: 8 years
Imposed: September 2008
Reason: Providing improper benefits to Bank staff and failing to maintain documentation to support fees charged for subcontractors
Megasoft Consultants Ltd
Term: 4 years
Imposed: December 2007
Reason: Participating in a joint venture with Bank staff while also conducting business with the Bank ...
More from Frontpage
| Single Page Format | Previous - 1 - 2 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

© 2009: The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved throughout the world