Indian Express

Express India

Screen

Loksatta

Express Cricket

Kashmir Live

Biz Publications
 
Make this your homepage | RSS


Why Pramod Mittal Gets Angry


Posted: Sunday, Jan 05, 2003 at 0000 hrs IST
Updated: Sunday, Jan 05, 2003 at 0000 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss

Mumbai, January 4:: they turned their attention to India, the lending institutions fell over each other to back them.

Somewhere along the way, Laxmi Mittal broke away and took with him all the profitable overseas companies, leaving behind the Indian projects - Ispat Industries, Ispat Metallics and Ispat Profiles - that were in various stages of implementation - to Pramod and Vinod.

Ever since, Ispat has been in continuous trouble with its lenders, who did not once reassess the group’s financials after the severance of the profitable businesses. The Ispat website tells the story. 1985: A star is born with the emergence of Nippon Denro Ispat (now known as IIL) as the largest manufacturer of Galvanised steel products in the private sector, proclaims the milestone section followed by a few more entries, which end abruptly at 1998 after the launch of its “global-scale integrated steel plant”.

It is after this that the institutions finally turned tough. Global steel prices had begun to dip well below the $400 per tonne at which viability of the projects had been calculated. Prices sank as low as $180/tonne and even today, after the recovery, prices are at $230. Yet, Mittal gets away.

In 1997, Vinod Mittal had boasted to a business paper that the head of Nucor Corporation, a US steel firm that has introduced cutting-edge technology, had told him: “Mr Mittal, we are learning from you”. Mittal had said, “We will let our new hot strip mill do the talking.” Today, there’s only a grim silence.

Yet, Pramod Mittal, a non-resident Indian who conducts most of his business long-distance with bi-monthly visit to his Indian business empire, is furious when asked about the delays in building his latest plant. “Did I know India was going to make a nuclear blast at Pokhran?’’ he asks. The company blames the delay in the second phase of its project on the refusal of the International Finance Corporation, Washington DC, to disburse $122.5 million of the $130 million sanctioned to it.

Ispat’s finance director Anil Sureka says it took another two years to tie up those missing funds. The Mittals couldn’t even bring in the additional equity they had promised because the IPO market was subdued, says an institutional source. Mittal however points out that they hold 60 per cent of IIL’s equity and have the largest direct contribution. His anger also does not explain the large-scale diversion of funds to promote a variety of...

More from Front Page

Single Page Format Previous - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - Next
Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
Flowers & Cakes DeliveryExpress Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you