Whatís ailing England

Jul 24 2014, 08:58 IST
Comments 0
SummaryI am not sure the groundsman at Lordís meant his wicket to be as challenging, and therefore as good for Test cricket, as it turned out to be.

I am not sure the groundsman at Lordís meant his wicket to be as challenging, and therefore as good for Test cricket, as it turned out to be. It was moody, fiery one moment, well behaved the next, but it gave you the impression it was always going to be naughty. And so it demanded appropriate counter-behaviour. Indiaís cricketers did it better. England, in spite of having seen many such capricious pitches, failed to control it. By the time the game ended, England couldnít have controlled a group of church going kids, so scrambled were they in their mind. They seemed so low on confidence they may not have crossed a road.

It shouldnít have been that way because this is a good England side. You may not believe it just now but they are. But winning isnít just about being good, it is about summoning that ability when most needed. England should have taken a decisive step ahead four times in this Test match and you rarely get as many opportunities.

That they still lost indicates an inability to read the moment and often that is because the mind is clouded by doubt.

The first was when they won the toss on a designer pitch. Like in Mumbai a couple of years ago, when you make a pitch believing the opposition cannot win, you reveal arrogance and show disrespect to the opposition. Sometimes, as in this Test, you can get bitten by your own folly. India ground out a total with modesty and assurance, and a bit of luck that seems to accompany such an attitude, but they also did so because England bowled dreadfully. At lunch on the first morning, some 7 percentage of balls were hitting the stumps.

And yet they had India 145 for 7, indicative in itself that if you bowled even a few well you could have the opposition in trouble. A masterly innings thwarted them. Ajinkya Rahane played an innings his idol, Rahul Dravid, would have been very proud of. It was old-fashioned in its craftsmanship, it respected the ball and did so with confidence, but it was modern in its execution. Jimmy Anderson was hit over his head for six for example! But if every ball from England had interrogated the batsman, the score would never have got to 295. That was opportunity number two.

Then again on the fourth day, in spite of a revealing

Single Page Format
Ads by Google

More from Miscellaneous

Reader´s Comments
| Post a Comment
Please Wait while comments are loading...