Wanted Rajat Gupta to walk free but evidence overwhelming: jurors

Comments print
Agencies: New York, Jun 16 2012, 11:36 IST
Rajat Gupta.jpg
The jury, which convicted one of the most prominent Indian-Americans in the US Rajat Gupta of securities fraud, said it wanted him to walk a free man after the trial, but the evidence against him and his “need for greed” was just too “overwhelming.”

Former Goldman Sachs director Gupta, 63, sat expressionless, flanked by his lawyers, in Manhattan federal court as the jury read out its guilty verdict yesterday.

It was a difficult day not just for Gupta and his family but for the jury of eight women and four men as well.

As the 12-member jury left the courtroom after delivering its verdict in Gupta's month-long insider trading trial yesterday, two were in tears.

Gupta's four daughters broke down and sobbed loudly as the guilty verdicts were pronounced while his wife rested her head on her hand and leaned on the courtroom bench.

Gupta looked at his family now and then, giving them a consoling glance. After the jury left the courtroom, he hugged his lawyers and walked up to his wife and daughters. The emotional family stood in a huddle for a long time. Gupta did not speak to the press as he left the courthouse, mobbed by journalists and camera persons.

Jury foreman Richard Lepkowski, 51, who read out the verdict in court said he had not wanted to convict Harvard-educated Gupta of insider trading.

“I wanted to believe the allegations weren't true,” Lepkowski told reporters after US District Judge Jed Rakoff adjourned the case yesterday afternoon. “Here was a man who came to

... contd.

Ads by Google
   1 | 2 | Next
Previous Story  Eurozone problems will impact India: PM Next Story  Facebook tech chief quits to start new firm
Reader's Comments (4)| Post a Comment

Fe Comment

Rahul | 11-Dec-2012Reply | Forward
In India he would have walked free or got indefinite bail .Shame on you America

Jury System in USA eliminates arbitrariness

madhuri | 25-Oct-2012Reply | Forward
Rajat Gupta was lucky the trial was being held in the USA. More lucky that the jury of eight women and four men and US District Judge were sympathetic towards him and didn't want to punish him. Its wrong to call the US justice system hilarious. Infact there is a huge difference between our ethical standards and theirs. In India we have IAS fellows sitting as judges in CAT and obliging their corrupt IAS batchmates and siding with them by leveling false allegations with no evidence to prove the same. In the USA it would be unthinkable to imagine a judge leveling false allegation against a person approaching him for justice ! Because Rajat Gupta has studied from Harvard therefore he must not be sentenced is a weak ground. In India he would have got away but not in the USA.

What a Justice

Paul | 18-Jun-2012Reply | Forward
It is funny that there is no evidence of wrongdoing, no taped conversation involving Rajat, nothing in terms of evidence, but a bunch of jurors with no knowledge of law find Gupta guilty. The justice system in US is hilarious.The only crime Rajat committed is he did not bribe any politician.Oops what a mistake.

Financial Express

@paul

Nik | 13-Dec-2012Reply | Forward
Can't agree any more ....Bit and Bit correct

Financial Express

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below