



: for the next 50 years. Any expectation that China will run out of steam due to adverse demographics, wage increases or large-scale excess capacity should be discarded.
The data reveals that the Indian economy’s dependence on consumption expenditure is also declining, though not as sharply as in China. Consumption contribution to GDP growth has declined from 75% in 1993-2000 to 59% in the latest period (2001-2007). This has seen a rise in investment expenditure’s contribution from 26% to 46% over the same period. This is indeed a positive trend that is likely to continue, thanks to the country’s favourable demographic structure. However, as larger numbers enter their productive years, accessible education, especially vocational education, and external demand (read exports of goods and services), would have to help generate the requisite employment.
Traditional macroeconomic theory had it that capital flows help to balance the economy’s balance of payments by compensating for changes in the current account. This has now been stood on its head, with capital account flows bearing little relation to the current account. How does one otherwise explain the fact that in 2007-08, according to our conservative projections, India is likely to receive $123 billion of capital inflows that will result in an increase of $104 billion in the reserves? These will reach about $365 billion by the end of March 2008, putting tremendous upward pressure on the rupee. The current account deficit for 2007-08, on the other hand, is expected to be a modest (-) 1.6% of GDP ($18.9 billion), with a merchandise trade deficit of $91 billion being almost fully covered by an invisibles surplus of $72 billion.
It is clear that these huge unsolicited inflows can be traced to treasury managers, portfolio funds and speculators trying to cash in on the “India story”.
The capital account’s link with the real economy has been snapped. This calls for a reworking of our own understanding of how to handle these flows and devise independent policy instruments to handle them to keep them broadly in line with the economy’s requirements. Therefore, unless critical issues in improving the investment environment, deepening the financial sector and reducing the infrastructure deficit are adequately addressed, it will be prudent and pragmatic to restrict these capital inflows by using well known and proven measures (see the last column of Ethical economics). We may otherwise find ourselves being at the mercy of financial market operators...
More from Edit & Column
| Single Page Format | Previous - 1 - 2 - 3 - Next |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

© 2009: The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved throughout the world