Banking regulations | Britain

The devil’s punchbowl

The Economist

Posted: Friday, Jul 10, 2009 at 0053 hrs IST
Updated: Friday, Jul 10, 2009 at 0053 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss

: A new hiring frenzy in the City, with bonuses guaranteed for “only” the first year; investment-banking results for the second quarter likely to top those of the first; an innovative securitisation by Barclays to get bank loans off its balance sheet. The term “business as usual” normally delights tradesmen and their customers. Applied to the banks that plunged Britain into economic crisis, it strikes fear to the heart.

Promised reforms to bank regulation, meant to curb the excess before it starts all over again, are in limbo. On Wednesday July 8 Alistair Darling, the chancellor of the exchequer (finance minister), unveiled plans to make banks hold progressively more capital, the bigger and more complex they are. Banks will be required, in effect, to add capital if they pose especial risks to the system, including higher capital charges if they pay bonuses that encourage short-term risk-taking.

This all sounds plausible. But Darling failed to explain how those varying capital requirements will be assessed and applied. In fact their calibration will depend not on Britain alone but also on work being done in Brussels for the European Council (a draft law is expected in October). And rules to increase the money banks must hold for liquidity are coming from the Basel Committee, a club of rich-country bank supervisors.

He also failed to change the outfit in charge of bank supervision. The much criticised “tripartite arrangements”, designed to help the treasury, the Bank of England and the Financial Services Authority (FSA) act as one in a crisis, are hardly touched. The trio failed in its first big test, the collapse of Northern Rock in 2007, prompting calls for authority over banks to be concentrated in the Bank of England, as it was before Labour took power in 1997. Instead, Darling wants the FSA to impose the varying capital charges; the Bank of England is to assess the systemic risk on which the charges will be based but will not have the power to enforce them. Overseeing it all will be a Council for Financial Stability, chaired by the chancellor himself.

Darling’s long-awaited white paper sets out a blueprint of sorts for how the current regulatory system might be adapted to more perilous times. It ducks the big questions, however. In particular, a lively debate over whether risky “casino” investment banking should be split from “utility” commercial and retail banking, guaranteed by the taxpayer, has been cut...

More from Selections From The Economist

Single Page Format 1 - 2 - 3 - Next
Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
Flowers & Cakes DeliveryExpress Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you