Supreme Court refuses to entertain PIL for reinstatement of Durga Shakti Nagpa

Comments 0
SummarySC has also demanded explanation from UP govt for arresting a scholar in a related case.

Bharti, in violation of its order.

Dalit writer held for FB post criticising Akhilesh, Azam over Nagpal suspension

Bharti, author of various books dealing with problems faced by Dalits, in his post had said that the Gautam Budh Nagar SDM was suspended for alleged demolition of wall of a mosque. However, Bharti was granted bail in the matter. The apex court had earlier on May 16 said that the person allegedly posting objectionable comments on social networking sites cannot be arrested by the police without getting prior permission from senior officers.

Azam’s supporters want NSA invoked against Dalit scholar

The court had directed the state government to strictly comply with the Centre's advisory which had said that a person should not be arrested without taking permission from police officials of the rank of IGP or DCP or SP level. In view of public outrage over people being arrested for making comments or liking posts on Facebook, Centre had on January 9 issued advisory to all states and UTs asking them not to arrest a person in such cases without prior approval of a senior police officer.

The apex court had restrained police while hearing an application seeking its direction to the authorities not to take action for posting allegedly objectionable comments during the pendency of a case before it pertaining to constitutional validity of section 66A of the Information Technology (IT) Act.

The section states that any person who sends, by means of a computer resource or communication device, any information that was grossly offensive or has a menacing character could be punished with imprisonment for a maximum term of three years, besides imposition of appropriate fine.

Single Page Format
Ads by Google
Reader´s Comments
| Post a Comment
Please Wait while comments are loading...