Singh to ask for greater cross-border flows

Economy Bureau

Posted: Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 0017 hrs IST
Updated: Saturday, Nov 15, 2008 at 0017 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss

New Delhi, Nov 14: A top economist and a prime minister, Manmohan Singh will have some sobering thoughts for the G-20 leaders assembling in Washington this weekend to brainstorm over the global financial crisis. Arguably the most qualified leader to attend the summit, Singh would tell the developed countries not to use the recession in their economies as a ruse to tilt their policies toward protectionism. These countries, instead, should encourage a free flow of goods & services and enhance capital flows, he would assert.

Retreating into a politically tempting ‘protectionist cocoon’ would be the easy but worst way to resolve the crisis, Singh would tell the likes of German Chancellor Angela Merkel, UK Premier Gordon Brown and US President George W Bush, whose economies are now officially in recession.

The summit, looked upon by many countries as the next Bretton Woods—the historic talks after WWII that led to a dollar-led new world economic order—also holds the prospects of ending up as a gab fest, given the hawkish pre-summit stance of the European countries and the chances of an assertive posturing by the BRIC countries. The summit will surely test the negotiating skills of Bush, as European and BRIC leaders are determined to place the blame for the global crisis squarely on the US and its ‘cowboy capitalism’. Still, past the blame game, the summit could draw the contours of a more disciplined global financial order.

Singh is expected to take an assertive but positive stand at the summit. He will have the benefit of finance minister P Chidambaram and deputy chairman of the Planning Commission Montek Singh Ahluwalia on his side in the negotiations.

En route to Washington, Chidambaram has revealed India’s position at the summit. He said India is going to call for a greater global oversight mechanism for monitoring the activities of international financial market players. Though a common regulation framework on the global level may be ‘too ambitious’ as national regulators would loathe the idea, India will pitch for common prudential and regulatory standards for all financial institutions in the world and a convergence of accounting standards to prevent a collapse of global financial institutions.

“In retrospect, it is clear that if there had been effective surveillance mechanism, it could have identified the huge risks that had been taken by some international financial institutions. There must be some way by which countries would have a global oversight with commonly accepted regulatory...

More from Economy

Single Page Format 1 - 2 - Next
Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
» Non-violent means towards non-violent ends.
Posted by Fareeda Rehman on 2008-11-15 14:40:18.05948+05:30
There can't be anything more stupid than not asking others to be protectionist. Opening up of barriers had its own devastating effect in the current fiasco. A non-violent solution would be attempting protectionist from ground-up. After having made the world largely developed with infrastructure, only very little needs be added to make it sufficient now for sustenance. At county levels, electoral institutions can be asked to take over whatever extent of tasks possible for this. The higher up formations need only be given those responsibilities that cannot be resolved completely at the lower levels. Higher formations should be authorised only to initiate and conduct the process of negotiations - and no powers for decisions are to be sent up. Almost all institutions are bound to fail here, from now on. Unless we brainstorm with common citizens and keep the experts and world-bankers out, there cannot be a permanent respite. Be warned.

Flowers & Cakes DeliveryExpress Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you