Shouldn’t be required to pay $6.78 million to Goldman: Gupta
In a lengthy 43-page motion filed in US District Court here on Friday, Gupta has opposed Goldman's demand for "restitution" of legal fees and other expenses totalling $6.78 million. Gupta, 64, said Goldman has not identified and submitted "competent evidence" of the legal fees that it can be reimbursed for.
Instead, the company has submitted 540 pages of billing records for a three-year period from December 2009 through November 2012 which do not contain specifics of the legal tasks performed by Goldman in connection with Gupta's case.
Gupta said Goldman is seeking reimbursement of fees for work that was not necessarily incurred during "participation in the investigation or prosecution" of Gupta.
This amount includes more than $3 million of fees incurred before hedge fund founder Raj Rajaratnam's trial concluded in May 2011 and before the US attorney's probe of Gupta "kicked into high gear”, Gupta's lawyer Richard Davis said in court papers.
Goldman is also seeking reimbursement of substantial fees for work on Securities and Exchange Commission matters, both before and after the Rajaratnam trial as well as for work done over the last five months, after the criminal case against Gupta ended.
Gupta also argues that Goldman is not entitled to restitution for legal fees it incurred relating to the SEC's administrative action against him. Legal fees that Goldman incurred in relation to the investigation and prosecution of Rajaratnam also do not qualify for reimbursement.
"Simply stated, Goldman is entitled to restitution of only those fees it can demonstrate were necessarily incurred in connection with specific requests by the government or were otherwise required to be done in the investigation or prosecution of the Gupta case," Davis said.
Be the first to comment.