SEBI, Sahara, 2G, mining, Vodafone dominated SC in 2012

Comments 0
SEBI, Sahara, 2G, mining, Vodafone dominated SC in 2012. (Reuters) SEBI, Sahara, 2G, mining, Vodafone dominated SC in 2012. (Reuters)
SummaryApex court allowed Vodafone International Holdings' appeal against the Bombay High Court decision

Severe jolt to Sahara Group, strict scrutiny of mining activities and scrapping of licences for 2G spectrum dominated the corporate legal battle in 2012 in the Supreme Court which gave a decisive victory to telecom major Vodafone in a Rs 11,000 crore tax case.

The apex court allowed Vodafone International Holdings' appeal against the Bombay High Court decision and held that the telecom giant's transaction with Hong Kong-based Hutchison Group was a "bonafide" FDI which fell outside the tax jurisdiction of the Indian authorities and cannot be termed as a "sham" deal entered into with an attempt to avoid tax.

While Vodafone was rejoicing its victory, the Income Tax department worked hard to get the verdict over-turned but failed to get any relief as the apex court rejected its plea for review of the January 20 judgement.

On other front, it was a lost battle for Sahara Group which on August 31 was directed to refund around Rs 24,000 crore to their investors within three months with 15 per cent interest per annum. The apex court said that if the companies--Sahara India Real Estate Corporation (SIREC) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation (SHIC)--fail to refund the amount then SEBI can attach properties and freeze bank accounts of the companies.

Attempts to get extension to comply with the directions ultimately bore some results when a bench headed by Chief Justice Altamas Kabir modified the directions passed by another bench and granted time till first week of February to refund the money. However, one judgement which gave a body blow to both the government and corporates, was the February 2 verdict of the apex court scrapping the 122 licences for the 2G spectrum.

After failing to get any relief against the February 2 verdict, government moved the apex court with Presidential Reference against the direction that all natural resources

have to be alienated through the route of "auction".

Finally, a five-judge constitution bench was of the oppinion that auction is not the only method for allocating natural resources to private companies and made it clear that its 2G verdict was confined to spectrum and not to other resources.

Along with the 2G spectrum matter, the illegal mining activities in Karnataka, Goa and other states involving nexus between big business houses and politicians came under the prying eyes of the Supreme Court.

A forest bench of the apex court directed CBI to probe into illegal mining activities in Bellary, Tumkur and Chitradurga

Single Page Format
Ads by Google

More from Telecom

Reader´s Comments
| Post a Comment
Please Wait while comments are loading...