SC/ST govt job promotions quota bill moved in Rajya Sabha amid high drama

Comments print
Agencies: New Delhi, Dec 13 2012, 17:33 IST
Parliament.jpg
Amid high drama, the controversial bill to provide quota to SCs/STs in government job promotions was finally taken up in the Rajya Sabha and it got support from various parties including BJP.

Moving the Constitution (117th Amendment) Bill, 2012, Minister of State for Personnel V Narayanasamy said it is important in the backdrop of backwardness of the Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes and their inadequate representation in government jobs.

With an aim of garnering maximum support, government has incorporated some crucial elements like 22 per cent cap on promotions for which consideration of Annual Confidential Report (ACR) will be crucial.

The bill, which is strongly opposed by Samajwadi Party, got conditional support from BJP and clear cut backing from some other parties like BSP, CPI-M, CPI, Trinamool Congress and JD-U. However, Shiv Sena did not support the bill.

Voting on the bill, which will require two-third support for its passage, is expected to take place on Monday.

The Upper House witnessed high drama when two SP members were directed to leave the House for causing disruptions over the quota bill, leading to arguments and counter-arguments before all members of the party walked out.

After the walkout by SP members, proceedings of the House went on smoothly.

Trouble started just before the bill was moved by Narayanasamy for consideration and passing, in the third attempt in the last four days.

He said agitations are going in some states and bill is aimed at removing injustice to the deprived categories.

The government will consider the efficiency in services part of the

... contd.

Ads by Google
   1 | 2 | 3 | Next
Previous Story  Reliance Industries shuts seventh well on KG-D6 gas block Next Story  Indian companies raised $4.29 bn from overseas markets in Oct
Reader's Comments (1)| Post a Comment

Fe Comment

nsraj | 15-Dec-2012Reply | Forward
THE RULES SHOULD BE VERY SIMPLE SPECIFIC EASY TO UNDERSTAND TO PREVENT ANY MISINERPRETATION CONFUSION AND LITIGATION. EFFICIENCY ,LIMITS,ACR CONSIDERATION BE CONTROLLED TO PREVENT INTERFERENCE AND DEPRIVATION OF SOCIAL JUSTICE TO NEEDY AND POOR PEOPLE

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below