Satyam board's minutes details Maytas decision

Agencies

Posted: Saturday, Jan 17, 2009 at 1520 hrs IST
Updated: Saturday, Jan 17, 2009 at 1520 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss

Hyderabad: The unanimous approval of Satyam's erstwhile board to the Maytas deal was not unanimous in letter and spirit, the minutes of the infamous December 16 meeting revealed on Saturday.

While the board had 'unanimously' passed the resolution for the USD 1.6 billion acquisition of two Maytas firms, run by Satyam founder Ramalinga Raju's family, many of the five independent directors raised concerns over the deal.

The concerns related to the valuation, actual benefits to the shareholders being a related party transaction and assurance about board being used as a "rubber stamp" and the company moving away from core business of IT.

Even after the passage of the resolution, the board members asked the company to make sure that compliance was ensured to their comments and proper justification was provided in case the actual value of the acquisition target turned out to be below what was told to them.

The minutes of the board meeting, held on December 16 and chaired by M Rammohan Rao, says that "without prejudice to the unanimous approval by the board members of the above resolution (acquisition of Maytas Properties), board members further reiterated that compliance shall be ensured for the comments made by all the directors as deliberated and discussed during this meeting...”

"...particularly that proper justification be provided to the board members in the event the valuation of Maytas Properties is significantly higher than the aggregate of the actual value of completed projects, current market realisation value of the work-in-progress and the basic market value notified by the state government for registration of lands awaiting development."

The board had approved an investment of up to Rs 6,410 crore towards acquiring Maytas Properties through various instruments, "as may be valued by the company in consultation with bankers, consultants and other intermediaries, pursuant to the applicable statutory and regulatory requirements."

During the course of the meeting last month, Satyam's then Chief Financial Officer Vadlamani Srinivas informed the board that the management considered this valuation as against Rs 6,523 crore evaluated by Ernst & Young.

But the global accounting firm has disputed doing the valuation for Maytas Properties -- of which it is, however, the statutory auditor.

According to the minutes, members noted the imperative of infrastructure foray, particularly based on leveraging on the brand of Satyam to become an eminent player in infrastructure as well.

Member Vinod Dham, however, noted that as transactions were between related parties it was important to demonstrate how it would...

More from Infotech

Single Page Format 1 - 2 - Next
Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
» SATYAM BOARD
Posted by Aanjiv on 2009-01-17 16:10:42.393906+05:30
So the Board acted like true rubber stamp in clearing the Resolution unanimously after some hair splitting for the sake of formality. President of India is bound by the advice of his cabinet. However, Board being bound by the advice or decree of CEO is new principle of corporate governance. Passing a unanimous Resolution 'without prejudice' to the views expressed by the members will not absolve this Board of the crime. Instead of buying shares of some other company, they should have asked to buy back shares of SATYAM with an option to subscribe to shares of MAYTAS simultaneously.

Flowers & Cakes DeliveryExpress Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you