FE REFLECT

Rules of the Law-III

Bibek Debroy

Posted: Thursday, Sep 10, 2009 at 2158 hrs IST
Updated: Thursday, Sep 10, 2009 at 2158 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss
  • Discount UK Shopping

: The problem of case pendency is as old as the hills. Exodus, 18.13 states, “And it came to pass on the morrow, that Moses sat to judge the people: and the people stood by Moses from the morning unto the evening.” As a single judge, Moses simply could not handle the problem. Jethro’s solution was more judges and more courts. We, of course, focus on some recent and major attempts to reduce pendency.

Lok Adalats

Lok Adalats originated because the established legal and juridical system failed to provide effective, fast and inexpensive justice. In 1980, a Committee known as CILAS (Committee for Implementing Legal Aid Schemes) was set up to monitor legal aid activities. This gave birth to Lok Adalat. The first Lok Adalat was held in 1982 in Junagadh, Gujarat. Lok Adalats are supplementary forums to provide quick, easy, accessible, non-technical and sympathetic dispute resolution mechanisms and should also address pendency problems.

The Lok Adalat system should have exploded. But this hasn’t quite happened. The number of Lok Adalats organised increased from 33,810 in 2001-02 to 35,167 in 2002-03 and 43,493 in 2003-04. However, this apparent success has not been matched by the number of cases that Lok Adalats have disposed of. That figure was 14,48,472 in 2001-02, but dipped to 12,52,021 in 2002-03 and to 11,80,371 in 2003-04. The problem does not seem to be paucity of financial resources. What is also noticeable is the great inter-state variation in performance of Lok Adalats. For instance, if cases disposed of divided by number of Lok Adalats organised is an acceptable indicator of Lok Adalat productivity, among major states, the performances of Bihar, Gujarat, Haryana, Jammu & Kashmir, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh have been outstanding.

Fast Track Courts

The Eleventh Finance Commission recommended and sanctioned the setting up of 1,734 Fast Track Courts (FTCs), with a special focus on cases involving under-trials, who had remained in jails for a period of more than two years. The original note prepared for the Eleventh Finance Commission is symptomatic.

The Commission approved a total grant of Rs 5.029 billion; Rs 4.3375 billion was released as grants until March 28, 2005. Of this, Rs 3.0148 billion was reported as utilised. In the first five years of their creation (2000-05), FTCs have disposed of 8,00,000 cases, compared to the 5,00,000 cases that they were expected to dispose of in a single...

More from FE Special

Single Page Format 1 - 2 - 3 - Next
Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
Express Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you