Brics and straws

Brics and straws

Brics Bank has its own limitations, and let us hope it will...
Much ado about execution

Much ado about execution

Effective delivery must be brought to the centre of policy-making...

Rising steel prices put the steel ministry in a fix

Mar 11 2008, 01:10 IST
Comments 0
SummaryRising steel prices have put the government in a classic catch-22 situation. Much as it would like to check prices—for their inflationary influence and impact on prices of end-consumer products like auto and durables—it can do precious little within the regulatory framework, which lets firms raise prices based on market movements.

Rising steel prices have put the government in a classic catch-22 situation. Much as it would like to check prices—for their inflationary influence and impact on prices of end-consumer products like auto and durables—it can do precious little within the regulatory framework, which lets firms raise prices based on market movements.

In 2004, the year elections were contested, the government had tried to check steel prices by reducing import duties, but this time, it does not have much elbowroom here since duties are at a low of 5%.

Though last year, the steel ministry had formed a price monitoring committee, under a joint secretary with industry representation, it has only an advisory role. The committee just serves as a forum for government-industry interaction, where the companies justify price hikes or asks for concessions, which is not within its purview.

Sources said the steel ministry is planning to render teeth to the price monitoring committee but support is not coming from other wings of the government, which feel that prices should be market-determined. Further, the steel ministry can’t even stop state-owned firms like the Steel Authority of India Ltd (Sail) and Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd (RINL) from raising prices as these two firms control only about 30% of the market.

An old proposal for putting a steel regulator has also failed to pass muster as the government has been advised that it is not feasible for the sector to have one. The government has been advised that a regulator can there be only in areas where the product or service is non-storable in nature. Steel can be stored and therefore does not fall in the category. Telecom services or power supply—the two sectors where there are regulators —are non-storbale. Further, the product or services should be non-exportable for being regulated. Steel is exportable whereas telecom and power are not. Regulators are required in areas where there’s a monopoly. There’s no monopoly in steel. In power and telecom, state-owned companies were having and continue to have an edge over newer private players.

Regulators are needed in areas where there’s fluctuating demand. Like in power there’s fluctuation between peak and off-peak hours. There’s no such scene in case of steel. In fact, the production of steel is higher than the consumption and there’s surplus available.

Regulators are required where the service is considered essential in nature. Power and telecom are essential services. Steel is not as there

Single Page Format
TAGS:
Ads by Google

More from Frontpage

Reader´s Comments
| Post a Comment
Please Wait while comments are loading...