



: This paper* examines the rationale for a top-down approach to budget preparation and approval, and discusses some factors that have to be considered when reorienting the budget process along these lines:
The paper argues that the sequence in which budgetary decisions are taken matters, and that a strong top-down approach strengthens fiscal discipline and improves policy prioritisation and coordination. Top-down budgeting also alters the division of roles and responsibilities between the central budget authority and line ministries, and requires that the process of determining the total expenditure level, sectoral allocations and individual appropriations is clarified. Finally, the paper argues that strong top-down elements in the parliamentary budget voting process can be effective in addressing the risk of excessive and unsustainable amendments during budget approval. The organisation of the budget process, and more specifically the order in which decisions about the size and the composition of the budget are taken, has an impact on government’s ability to peruse sound fiscal policies. By ensuring that a decision on the total expenditure level is taken before the budget is allocated to main sectors, and that sectoral ceilings are set before the details of the budget are negotiated, it is possible to strengthen aggregate fiscal control and better align the budget with policy priorities.
* Gösta Ljungman; Top-Down Budgeting—An Instrument to Strengthen Budget Management; IMF, WP/09/576, November 2009
More from Edit & Column
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

© 2010: The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved throughout the world