The Oil Ministry has informed the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) that it has not given final nod to Reliance Industries' plans to raise natural gas output from the flagging KG-D6 fields as the firm has refused to allow audit of its expenditure by CAG.
Oil Secretary G C Chaturvedi told a meeting convened by Pulok Chatterji, Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister, on September 24 that KG-D6 block oversight committee - headed by DGH with representative of the ministry - has agreed to all the development proposals made by RIL, sources said here.
Chaturvedi, they said, told the meeting that finalisation of the decisions is however pending due to RIL's refusal to allow second round of audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) of its spending on the eastern offshore KG-D6 block.
While the Management Committee of KG-D6 block in August agreed to approval of capital spending plans pending for past three years, the resolution has so far not been signed. Also, at least three discoveries RIL has made in the block have so far not been declared commercial, a step necessary to begin production from them.
Besides, it had approved the revised field development plan for MA oil and gas field in the same block in August but formal orders have not been issued. All these investments, RIL says, are necessary to reverse drop in output at the fields.
Sources said Chaturvedi apprised the PMO of the status of production in the KG-DWN-98/3 or KG-D6 block and contractual issues related to it. He told the meeting that production has been continuously declining at the field since 2010-11 when it had hit a peak of 61.5 mmscmd.
Sources said RIL had on September 18 written to the Oil Ministry saying it was open to financial audit of its spending on the field, which has seen production drop by over 55 per cent to 27.5 million standard cubic meters per day instead of rising to planned 80 mmscmd, but emphasised that CAG did not have powers to audit a private company.
RIL said CAG's 2009 audit, which it had agreed to as a one-time exception, turned out to be a 'performance' audit which was contrary to the provisions of the Production Sharing Contract (PSC).
The PSC provides for checking of the contractor's accounts in order to verify the charges and credits but not questioning efficacies of processes or technology used in the complex deepsea operations.