‘Rajus gave fake papers to auditors’

fe Bureau

Posted: Sunday, Apr 05, 2009 at 0129 hrs IST
Updated: Sunday, Apr 05, 2009 at 0129 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss

New Delhi: Accounting regulator, Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has claimed Price Waterhouse auditors for Satyam scandal were given fake documents by the company management.

President of ICAI, Uttam Prakash Agarwal said he was informed by the deposed CFO of Satyam, Srinivas Vadlamani, that the fake papers were prepared with the consent the company’s then management including former chairman B Ramalinga Raju and his brother, who was a member of the board of directors B Rama Raju.

Agarwal told FE, “The two auditors have claimed that they are innocent and have not done anything wrong. Infact, Vadlamani has also accepted that the two auditors were given fake documents which did not reflect the true picture of the company.” This also allegedly included papers to show inflated profits which never existed.

ICAI got the permission from the local court in Hyderabad to examine and record the statements of the two ex-auditors of Satyam and the company CFO in Chanchalguda jail in the city. The Rs 7,800-crore accounting fraud at Satyam has been the largest ever such case in Indian corporate history. The reveleations by Ramalinga Raju of the fraud sent the stock markets crashing, raised questions on the Indian IT success story and forced the government to intervene to set up a nominated board chaired by Nasscom president Kiran Karnik which is now working on bids to acquire a majority stake in the firm.

The ICAI president had earlier said the auditors would be interrogated mainly on accounting and auditing aspects and to check whether they followed the right methods of accounting.

Sirnivas also allegedly told the two-member ICAI team that the fraud in the company balance sheets was going on for the last “four-five years”.

Vadlamani Srinivas, according to Agarwal, told the ICAI team that he did everything to support the management. The alleged “masterminds” behind the scam were Ramalinga Raju and his brother.

“He (Vadlamani Srinivas) told us the auditors have no role in the scam. All Fixed Deposit receipts and bank statements were provided by one G Ramakrishna who was heading the cost accountancy department of the company, under the direction of (Ramalinga) Raju,” Agarwal said. These papers in turn, were produced before the two external auditors - S

Gopalakrishnan and Srinivas Talluri. Both of them told the ICAI team that they were innocent and had no role in fudging books of accounts of Satyam.

The auditors also told the ICAI team...

More from Infotech

Single Page Format 1 - 2 - Next
Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
» Really Auditors were 100% pure
Posted by SC Aggarwal on 2009-07-24 12:41:15.114494+05:30
Mr. Uttam Prakash Agarwal, chief of ICAI says that Satyam auditors were totally innocent. In othr words, by producing fake papers before the auditors, a balance sheet, profit and loss account can be got signed from the Auditors. Can we say Mr. Aggarwal that CAs in our country cannot be trusted because they do not examine accounts but only sign.

» Shocking stance!
Posted by Sudhir Jain on 2009-04-06 17:05:05.271657+05:30
It is indeeed shocking that the President of ICAI, Mr Agarwal, has even thought of, let alone shamelessly and lamely trot out this excuse to the public, that this is a good enough argument to defend the criminal negligence shown by Satyam's auditors. So, is the President of ICAI asking the investing public to believe that auditors cannot be faulted if they are "presented" with "fake" documents? What, in God's name, are then auditors supposed to be verifying and auditing, if not these very deceptions? Or, is the President saying that auditors are entitled to those hefty fees for merely signing off on those Financial Reports?

» More that meets the eye
Posted by Gee on 2009-04-06 01:16:04.578408+05:30
It is surprising that Merrill Lynch, after just a 3-4 weeks of going through the books were able to identify discrepencies but PwC was not able to after 4-5 years. This seems like a lame effort to isolate the issue and not take any far reaching action. But nothing can also be expected from ICAI as Gopalkrishna was also a high ranking member of the ICAI

» PwC auditors did not know?
Posted by Gee on 2009-04-06 01:06:14.513699+05:30
It is surprising that Merrill Lynch, after just a 3-4 weeks of going through the books were able to identify discrepencies but PwC was not able to after 4-5 years. This seems like a lame effort to isolate the issue and not take any far reaching action. But nothing can also be expected from ICAI as Gopalkrishna was also a high ranking memebr of the ICAI

Flowers & Cakes DeliveryExpress Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you