Rajesh Khanna’s ‘live-in partner’ files case against Dimple, Twinkle, Akshay
Magistrate S S Deshpande has asked the family to file their say on or before November 27. In a domestic violence case filed before the Bandra Magistrate court on Wednesday, Advani claimed that as she was Khanna’s live-in partner since 2003, she is entitled to his property. She also said she was forcibly evicted from his sprawling Carter Road residence Aashirwad.
Alleging that Khanna’s family manipulated the will, Advani sought protection under the Domestic Violence Act and re-entry into the house. In her application, she further stated that under Section 19 of the Act, the magistrate may, on being satisfied that domestic violence has taken place, pass a residence order restraining the respondent from “dispossessing or in any other manner disturbing the possession of the aggrieved person from the shared household whether or not the respondent has a legal or equitable interest in the shared household”, and that the family is guilty of evicting her from the house.
Advani’s lawyer Manohar Shetty said in case the court doesn’t help her get possession of the bungalow, she seeks Rs 50 crore compensation under Section 20 of the Act.
Advani is an entrepreneur and niece of former Philippines president Ferdinand Emmanuel Marcos.
Oops !!Ejaz Khan | 09-Nov-2012Reply | Forward Its just a way to get fame nothing else, The Superstar has died and Anita got gready, So sad
LEGAL DISPOSSESSION THROUGH DV ACTsiff_member | 09-Nov-2012Reply | Forward DV ACT AWARENESS: 1) THE OWNER OF THE HOUSE CAN BE KICKED OUT OF THE HOUSE THROUGH A RESIDENCE ORDER FROM THE COURT WHILE HIS FEMALE PARTNER WOULD BE GIVEN THE RIGHT TO RESIDE THERE. 2) EVEN A LIVE IN PARTNER CAN FILE A CASE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASE AGAINST A MAN, HIS LEGAL WIFE AND OTHER MEMBERS OF THE FAMILY.
Live-in partnerSudhir Goel | 09-Nov-2012Reply | Forward His family didn't do anything for me for the last 10 years so they don't deserve anything from him. Even if he wrote something in the last few days, he could have been coerced into giving it to them.
replyvv | 09-Nov-2012Reply | Forward the main question here is that it is she who is claiming she was his partner. he never said she was anything more than a friend.so she was not his live in partner.