Rail Budget 2013: Bansal's tough task to put Railways back on track

Comments print
KG Narendranath: New Delhi, Feb 26 2013, 03:59 IST
Pawan Kumar Bansal.jpg
averaged at just 9%, the rate of real GDP growth. Rail freight traffic grew a dismal 6% in 2011-12 (nominal GDP expanded 16% in the year) and maybe 5% this year (nominal GDP growth around 13%).

On the one hand, Railways overcharges captive consumer industries like steel, coal, iron ore and cement even at the expense of volumes and market share, and on the other, it heavily subsidises passengers, especially those who travel by lower classes. Of Railways’ gross traffic receipts, 65% came from freight in 2007-08, when it recorded a healthy operating ratio of 75.9 and the share of freight in gross traffic receipts has only increased to 67% this year.

The operating ratio is the ratio of total receipts to total expenditure including appropriation to Depreciation Reserve Fund meant to replenish existing assets and Pension Fund but excluding Capital and Development Funds.

The decline in operating ratio has depleted Railways funds drastically since 2007-08, when their combined closing balance stood at an encouraging Rs 22,279 crore. One won’t be surprised if the Revised Estimate for this year’s opening fund balance is close to nil.

The Capital Fund supposed to be used for creating new revenue-generating assets had soared to Rs 11,072 crore in 2007-08 but remained exhausted in 2009-10. Appropriations to this Fund only marginally exceeded withdrawals in subsequent years, and this year’s BE shows net allocation of Rs 5,000 crore, a impossible task given the current state of affairs. The operating ratio for this fiscal could be around 90, although 84.9

... contd.

Ads by Google
   Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
Previous Story  Pantaloon Retail posts loss of Rs 20.41 cr in Dec quarter Next Story  Budget should focus on investments and retail
Reader's Comments (6)| Post a Comment

RAILWAY BUDGET - DISAPPOINTS to DHARMAPURI DIST. Tamil Nadu

sivabd | 26-Feb-2013Reply | Forward
IT IS ABSOLUTELY DISAPPOINTING. AGAIN.....WE HAVE FAILED TO GET OUR LEGITIMATE, DECADES LONG PENDING SHARE OF DHARMAPURI-MORAPPUR CONNECTIVITY IN THIS RAILWAY BUDGET. WITH CONGRESS RULING IN CENTER WITH d.m.k SUPPORT, WE COULD HAVE DEFINITELY DONE THIS TIME. SURPRISING WHY D.M.K HIGH COMMAND DID NOT HEED TO OUR DISTRICT NEEDS. HAD THE DMK LEADER PITCHED HIGH-VOICE, DHARMAPURI WOULD HAVE CERTAINLY GOT THIS MORAPPUR-DHARMAPURI RAILWAY LINK. THIS IS LOST OPPORTUNITY FOR NEXT LOKSABHA ELECTION RESULT, FOR SURE. ONLY LAST WEEK FOR THE FIRST TIME, TR BAALU MADE A MENTION ABOUT DHARAMPURI-MORAPPUR REQUIREMENT...THAT TOO IN THE LAST ITEM IN THE LIST. THAT ITSELF, WE ALL FELT VERY VERY FRUSTRATING. THE PRIORITY OF DHARMAPURI TO COME OUT OF ITS BACKWARDNESS, IS NOT HIGHLIGHTED THERE. WITHOUT HIGHER COMMAND GETTING ATTENTION OF DHARMAPURI DISTRICT NEED. SEEMS LIKE OUR HNBL DMK MP SHRI THAMARAI SELVAN VOICE IS NOT GETTING DUE RESPECT. DEEPLY FRUSTRATED, HURT AND VERY CONCEREND-Siva@DHARMAPURI

Cause and resolution of Inflation

sandip | 26-Feb-2013Reply | Forward
The railway budget is the perfect example of how to cause inflation in the coming days and later come back and give a resolution to earn votes stating that the govt was able to bring down the inflation rates. The govt never looks at the cost of operation of the railway department. It never realizes that it can bring down operation cost and increase profitability, rather than axing people. What about ticketing sharks? If booking an e ticket is getting expensive by the day, than what is the point in having such a service. On second thought I was under the impression that it reduces lot of man hrs which railway ideally has to pay a salary for manning the reservation counters. Cost of installing a server and networking is a one time cost and I'm sure that maintenance of the said server certainly does not exceed the cost of manning reservation counters, else banks would have gotten away with such technology long ago.

Fe Comment

L N Bhola | 26-Feb-2013Reply | Forward
Paralysis by Analysis. Lau Prasad Yadav was a Good Railway Minister no doubt. Bansal shows, he is sophisticated, but-his delivery Module is 'way far behind Lay Prasad Yadav'! For example, look at the Logic, he puts, Railways collects a revenue of Rs,7500 Crore from Odisha region, and Railway is haggling with Odisha Govt request to saction even below 500 core. So it proves he is more intelligent than laluji, but-has a useless, mindless delivery mechanism.

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below