Ordinance is in response to public demand, says PC

Comments print
Express news service :New Delhi, Feb 05 2013, 00:08 IST
FP.jpg
in the Budget Session of Parliament and “there will be discussions with political parties. There will be a debate in Parliament when the Bill is introduced to replace the ordinance”.

While recommendations on punishment have been accepted, Chidambaram said the ordinance has prescribed death as the maximum punishment in case of rape followed by injury which causes death or leaves the victim in a persistent vegetative state. He said death has been prescribed as the maximum punishment in the case of a second conviction for sexual assault or aggravated sexual assault. Besides, the ordinance contains provisions amending the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Indian Evidence Act. “These amendments are intended to protect the dignity of the victim, restrain any police excesses and facilitate better recording of evidence. These provisions will ensure fair and speedy trial of cases and more stringent punishment to those convicted,” he added.

Ads by Google
   Previous | 1 | 2
Previous Story  Posco Orissa plant could start steel output by ’18 Next Story  Short-term capital gains tax likely to continue
Reader's Comments (4)| Post a Comment

Ordinances on public demand!

Vatsal Yajnik | 05-Feb-2013Reply | Forward
This is an eyewash.Guts demand to include " banning politicians from contesting polls when criminal case is pending". Oh i forgot that no government will pass laws or ordinances that will cuts its own feet.

Justice on public demand

atis | 05-Feb-2013Reply | Forward
It is great to listen this!Tomorrow again a Barbri mosque will be demolished on public demand,based on level of sound bytes and media publicity! We have got a very great home minister similar to Rehman malik of Pakistan!

WHY NOT DO THE SAME FOR JANLOCKPAL DEMAND.

ramesh | 05-Feb-2013Reply | Forward
WHY NOT DO THE SAME FOR JANLOCKPAL DEMAND BY SUCH A HUGE PUBLIC?WHY NOT GIVE TEETH TO RTI ACT?WHY NOT DO GOVERNANCE?WHY NOT GIVE FAST JUSTICE IN EACH CASE BY PROVIDING SUFFICIENT FUNDING OF ATLEAST 1% OF GDP TO JUDICIARY?WHY NOT BAN POLITICIANS HAVING CRIMINAL CASES FROM CONTESTING ELECTION BY CHANGING CONSTITUTION?WHY NOT ALLOW POLICE COMPLAINT THROUGH INTERNET?WHY NOT HAVE REAL PRAJASAKTA I.E DEMOCRACY?WILL RAPIST NOT KILL WOMAN IF HE IS GOING TO BE HANGED ANYWAY AND REMOVE EVIDANCE?ETC

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below