Of FDI, Wal-Mart & controversies: An eventful year for retail

Comments print
PTI: New Delhi, Dec 24 2012, 13:53 IST
Retail.jpg
practices against it in foreign markets, including India. In March this year, the firm started a worldwide review of its policies, practices and internal controls for US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act compliance.

Following this, Bharti Walmart suspended five people, including Chief Financial Officer Pankaj Madan, as part of the global investigation. After this, the JV decided to put a halt on opening of new cash and carry wholesale stores in India pending the probe.

While Wal-Mart hit the headlines in multi-brand, it was IKEA that made news continuously in the single-brand segment.

The Swedish furniture announced plans to invest Rs 10,500 crore in India to open 25 stores over a period of time. It had proposed to invest 600 million euro (Rs 4,200 crore) to open 10 stores in the first stage.

The remaining 900 million euro (Rs 6,300 crore) for opening 15 more stores.

The Scandinavian retailer, however, wanted the government to relax the clause for mandatory sourcing of 30 per cent from MSMEs. After months of dialogue, the government relented and relaxed it for single brand segment.

The IKEA Group, which manufactures and sells home and office furnishing products, applied afresh after the norms were relaxed. In November, the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB), cleared the proposal but out of 29 products, the

company was prevented from selling 14 items like textile products, consumer electronics, leather products, lifestyle products and food and beverages at its restaurants and cafes.

However, IKEA has approached FIPB again seeking a review of its

... contd.

Ads by Google
   Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
Previous Story  Crude oil futures down on global cues Next Story  India works to protect interests not inflame Pakistan: Afghan report
Reader's Comments (1)| Post a Comment

Fe Comment

Virendra Kumar | 26-Dec-2012Reply | Forward
WalMart may use its partner Bharti's political muscle to get relaxations in 30% indigenous sourcing and back-end infrastructure commitments. TESCO does not want to get involved in controversies, due to a conservative partner Tata. Metro is not interested in front-end retail, the best policy for 'free of controversy' co-existence with Indian retailers and politicians. Other foreign retailers may be waiting in the fence, till fate of WalMart is known and policies are more congenial for free trade

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below