Indian Express

Express India

Screen

Loksatta

Express Cricket

Kashmir Live

Biz Publications
 
| Make this your homepage | RSS

Nuclear deals benefit emerging economies

Soumya Kanti Mitra

Posted: 2008-07-16 01:09:22+05:30 IST
Updated: Jul 16, 2008 at 0109 hrs IST

: The hue and cry that is being raised by the BJP and Left Parties about India’s proposed nuclear deal with the US may have made (a strange sort of) sense had India been alone in sticking out its neck. That, at least, may have suggested that the government at the Centre was taking undue risks, bartering away sovereignty.

Sceptics may doubt that, thinking that you can fool some of the people all of the time. But they also know that you cannot fool all of the people all of the time—and altogether too many countries have been queuing up to sign up 123 agreement for peaceful cooperation with the US. They surely merit a second look?

They include such UNSC nuclear stalwarts as the People’s Republic of China, Russia—plus members of the Nuclear Supply Group (NSG) like Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada Japan, Kazakhstan, Republic of Korea, Romania, Russia, South Africa, Switzerland and Ukraine.

None of these nations appear to be unduly worried—either about issues of national sovereignty, or about the conditionalities embodied in the so-called 123 agreement, although the latter derive from the US Atomic Energy Act of 1954. Even Bangladesh, Colombia, Egypt, Indonesia, Morocco, Taiwan and Thailand are signatories to 123 agreement—as is Norway, a country that zealously guards its sovereign rights.

This disregard for ‘going it alone’ in matters of defence strategy should be noted by all those who inveigh against the 123 agreement. They need to wake up to the new reality of cooperation in nuclear trade, technology and materials.

As for the instance in hand, no significant nuclear transaction can occur before the US State Department has negotiated an agreement that meets the criteria which have been set out in Section 123 a (1) through (9), 42 USC 2151, with the advice of the Department of Energy. While such an agreement would not address specific programmes, it would provide a framework of non-proliferation controls for commercial nuclear energy transactions. And, to repeat, what is so surprising is the number of countries that have opted in.

Take Brazil: the agreement which it has negotiated in accordance with the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (amended by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978, or otherwise) provides a comprehensive framework for peaceful nuclear cooperation between the US and Brazil under appropriate conditions and controls. It reflects a strong common commitment to the goals of nuclear non-proliferation. The latest agreement, in fact, supersedes an older one of...

Single Page Format 1 - 2 - 3 - Next
Ads by Google
Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
» Distortions .. facts are missing .. !!
Posted by aKusari on 2008-08-03 12:54:24.742975+05:30
Look .. clearly for transaction with India, the USA has passed the draded HYde Act ..which was not the case with China or elsewhere..!! News items, as above, conceals this and is a dangerous distortion of facts.. !! It is often said that modern-day "Nitizens" do not mind for 'Nation and or National Interests" if to acquire some hardware/software .. !!They might not protest on 'portals' or in public if required to surrender to Foreign interests like in N-deal with the USA. But this is nothing but myth .. !! Protests are coming forth from all corners against the deal .. when it is going to surrender our soverignity to others. The IAEA will enter our country only to inspect our civilian N-plants "perpetually" where extreme costly supplies will come from USA which is again conditional .. !! What a sell off .. !! The chronology of events shows that the 'managers' in the Govt. under a so-called clean PM had kept the nation in dark and was secretly preparing .. whereas their Left friends were alarming for long quite clearly not to go ahead .. !! The nation was divided for/against the deal without knowing the details. Ultimately, when exposed, the supporters had to resort to 'bribing' and 'cross-voting' in Parliament to get a Confidence .. !! The nation is shamed .. the Indian 'nitizens' are not in a position to keep their faces to their global pals .. !! It is further stated that N-power will be only 3-4% of India power needs even after 20 yrs when the so-called plants will be ready .. !!

» Chose the right option-Ignore Marxist manic opposition
Posted by B.Ganguly on 2008-07-16 09:09:12.489347+05:30
India's economic progress hinges on enhancing power supply and this is posiible from nuclear energy mainly.India did good thing for going in for getting material for generating nuclear energy.Enters Karat,and all hell is letlose.He is pathologically averse to USA and clearly against India progressing.His loyalties are questionable ,are out side India and his patriotism suspect.He will try to wreck this nation economically.Time Marxist party kicks him out and elects a sane and sensible leader

20% Cash back on hotels
- Yatra.com
Send Gifts
Flowers and Gifts