NSEL crisis: Mumbai Police arrests Anjani Sinha

Comments 0
Anjani Sinha is the former head of the National Spot Exchange (NSEL). Anjani Sinha is the former head of the National Spot Exchange (NSEL).
SummaryEarlier, police had arrested Jay Bahukhundi and Amit Mukherjee in connection with the NSEL scam.

The Economic Offences Wing of Mumbai Police today arrested former managing director and chief executive of the beleaguered National Spot Exchange (NSEL) Anjani Sinha.

Before arresting him, he was interrogated by EOW for several hours; yesterday he had been interrogated at length by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).

Sinha was arrested for his role in the Rs 5,600 crore payment crisis at the NSEL which has affected 13,000 investors across the country, police said.

This is the third arrest in the case; earlier the police had arrested Amit Mukherjee, a former assistant vice-president of the exchange on October 9, while Jay Bahukhundi, another former assistant vice-president, was arrested the next day.

The ED has registered `preliminary inquiry' under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, suspecting large-scale money laundering in the spot exchange.

Sinha and his wife Shalini, who is managing director of family-run firm SNP Designs, were questioned by both ED and EOW.

Sinha, who filed an affidavit before a city court a few days ago, blamed the entire former senior management of NSEL, including himself.

The affidavit said he suspected that some of the former senior management members might have entered into dealings with buying members for their personal benefit and demanded a judicial inquiry against them.

He admitted to submitting "wrong stock statement" to NSEL the board and regulator Forward Market Commission, based on the report by the warehousing division.

Taking the blame for not informing the board about increasing exposure and risk of widespread defaults, Sinha stated the management allowed the exchange to function and did not stop trading due to fear of widespread defaults.

"By 2011-12, the scenario was such that if we do not allow rollover, buyers would have defaulted with huge amount. On the other hand, if we continue to allow him to rollover his position, his exposure keeps on increasing every year by 20-25 per cent due to impact of rollover cost and exchange fee," he stated in the affidavit.

Citing several instances of misrepresentation of stock position and fund diversion by buyers, Sinha said buyers diverted funds availed through fictitious sale transactions to buy real estate and other

Single Page Format
Ads by Google
Reader´s Comments
| Post a Comment
Please Wait while comments are loading...