Retail FDI: How will you protect small traders, is this a 'political gimmick', Supreme Court asks govt

Comments print
PTI:  Jan 22 2013, 13:00 IST
Small traders.jpg
Is FDI in retail a "political gimmick"?, the Supreme Court today asked the Government while seeking its response on how it intends to safeguard the interest of small traders after opening up the retail sector to foreign direct investments (FDI).

The apex court said that interest of small traders should not be affected by FDI in retail sector.

The apex court said that there is apprehension in the mind of small traders that their business would be affected with the coming of multinational companies in retail sector which needs to be allayed by the government by putting some regulatory mechanism.

A bench headed by Justice R M Lodha and S J Mukhopadhaya asked the Centre to file its response on these aspects within three weeks and also queried whether some foreign investment has come in the country after opening of retail sector or it was just a "political gimmick".

"What checks are there to ensure that free trade is not affected, particularly the interest of small traders," the bench said while hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by an advocate questioning Centre's policy of opening retail sector for foreign direct investment.

"Apprehension is there in the mind of people that small traders' interest would be affected. How do you intend to allay the fear. Some regulatory mechanism has to be there," the bench said.

Favouring regulatory framework to protect small traders, the bench said that the big companies can bring price of commodity down through unfair trade practises forcing small traders to shut their

... contd.

Ads by Google
   1 | 2 | Next
Previous Story  Breathing program may help save newborns' lives: studies Next Story  Asia's junk bond rally near exhaustion
Reader's Comments (3)| Post a Comment

Judges should show maturity

s ramji | 22-Jan-2013Reply | Forward
From when has the SC started working for the interest of small industries and traders etc. In case these people exploit the customers will the SC take Small industries side or customers side. It looks the judges think they are above bode - So why did the SC not take up the matter Suo moto when Reliance industries, Bharti, More, Fresh etc opened super bazaars. Do the judges know that the service customers get from these super markets are far more superior to those that were being provided earlier by the small traders. A small question and the BREAKING NEWS in all TV channels is that SC questions government. Hope the judges do not play to the galary.

Fe Comment

Krish | 22-Jan-2013Reply | Forward
SC should mind it's own business this is a governance issue not a legal issue. Ask who will protect the consumers from the chotta banias

How do SC fix accountability for small traders?

priyabratatripathy | 22-Jan-2013Reply | Forward
It is good to hear that SC is taking cognizance of the possible discomfort to the traders. But, what about the plight of consumers? What about the tax evasion by the traders? What about the adulteration by the traders?

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below