- Miffed Shiv Sena tells Narendra Modi: 'Take it easy' on Maharashtra, taunts him with Dawood Ibrahim jibeProbes after Modi rally attack throw up former SIMI member's nameTrader launches 'The Namo Store' for Narendra Modi merchandiseNarendra Modi revs up into 'populist gear' with jobs, wages, power, land, sops aplenty in offing
The snooping of a woman allegedly at the behest of Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi was not confined to Gujarat but extended to Karnataka as well, according to an investigative portal, contradicting the claims of the BJP government.
The portal, gulail.com, has released a set of fresh 39 tapes, which contained purported conversation between between two senior Gujarat police officials, G L Singhal and A K Sharma, about the spying on the woman.
The website, which along with another portal cobrapost.com had first exposed the matter, said Gujarat police had in 2009 contacted its Karnataka counterpart during the Chief Ministership of B S Yedyurrapa for intercepting the telephone of the particular woman in Bangalore where she lived.
The Karnataka government, however, turned down the request, saying due procedures were not followed and that "the order had been signed by a junior officer who was not even authorised to issue phone-tapping instructions".
According to the claims by the websites, the snooping was being undertaken at the behest of 'saheb', an apparent reference to Modi. In some of the tapes, the then state Home Minister and Narendra Modi's close aide Amit Shah is purportedly heard referring to 'saheb' repeatedly.
"The Gujarat police not only circumvented the process for tapping of phones, some junior officers of the state home department directly ordered the telecom companies to carry out illegal surveillance," the website has claimed.
It said the move was in clear violation of Indian Telegraph Rule 419 (A) and the Gujarat Government's own
notification (dated 29th March 1997), which clearly state that a phone can be tapped only with the written authorisation of the Union Home Secretary or state Home Secretary.
The new tapes contradict the claims made by Gujarat government that the woman was merely being 'provided security' during her visits to Gujarat at the request of her father.
The new tapes, the website claimed, establish the woman's surveillance which involved massive use of state machinery and was mounted not to protect her as claimed by the state government but to "stalk her and pry into her private life".
"Just like in the first batch of tapes, here too all the persons