Lower costs won’t lower regulatory compliance

Comments print
Ashish Rukhaiyar:  Nov 16 2012, 02:53 IST
Even though he is launching a new stock exchange in difficult stock market conditions, the promoter and Vice-Chairman of MCX-SX Jignesh Shah appears full of gusto and zeal. He tells Ashish Rukhaiyar that 80% of the volumes comes from equity derivatives and not much capital formation or bond market development is taking place. This, he says, leaves a big space for a new exchange to deliver capital formation, bond market development and all-round market development. He has also announced 35-50% lower costs than other exchanges.

How do you see the exchange space panning out in the near future? As there are already two national level exchanges, how do you justify the need for a third exchange?

A full-fledged capital market is the need of the hour for India. Globally, if you look at any developed economy, equity constitutes only 13% of the capital market and other asset classes—debt, corporate and government bonds, interest rate futures, currency, SME, etc—constitute the remaining 87% of the market. While everyone says that we have two national-level exchanges, I think not much has been done to develop this 87% of the market segment, which, in a way, remains unexplored. Here, I want to explicitly state that the government, regulator and the policymakers have done enough and everything to develop the capital market, more so during the last 10 years. Sebi, as a regulator, has created a very conducive environment for 360-degree development of our markets. It is important for the exchanges to play the developmental role and

... contd.

Ads by Google
   1 | 2 | 3 | Next
Previous Story  FE Editorial : Making PPPs work Next Story  Inside Africa’s consumer revolution
Reader's Comments| Post a Comment

Be the first to comment.

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below