Looking through UP

Comments print
The Indian Express:  Feb 06 2013, 01:35 IST
DP.jpg
The next Lok Sabha election could happen as early as September, if Mulayam Singh Yadav is to be believed. His eager anticipation of the event isn’t exactly news. Every party is loudly preparing for the fray, and the date could well be advanced. Netaji’s words are a rallying cry to the Samajwadi Party cadre, a promise of good things to come. Yet, this overwhelming imperative of getting him to the prime minister’s office may well be taking a toll: it has become one of the reasons to keep the SP distracted and ineffective in power in Uttar Pradesh.

In April 2012, the Samajwadi Party won the state by a majority, only the second time in nearly two decades that a single party has formed the government in UP. It was a composite mandate — the party had drawn voters from every caste and religious group in UP’s famously fragmented political terrain. Great hopes rested on the new government, therefore, which was headed by a young and sincere-seeming Akhilesh Yadav. This was billed to be UP’s shot at a turnaround, much like neighbouring Bihar’s near-transformation in recent years under the stewardship of Nitish Kumar.

By all accounts, that opportunity is being steadily squandered. This is in part because the SP’s attention is trained on Delhi, and partly because it is slipping back to the bad old ways, with out-of-control party workers interfering, unchecked, in police and administration. Rather than strengthening economic fundamentals, the state government spends its resources on freebie schemes designed to

... contd.

Ads by Google
   1 | 2 | Next
Previous Story  Rains break seven-decade record in Delhi Next Story  Pakistan is a 'fake' country: Markandey Katju
Reader's Comments (2)| Post a Comment

SP governement

Indian Citizen | 06-Feb-2013Reply | Forward
SP is a proven party of goondas which has neither a vison , nor any moral character to lead UP into a mordern progressive state. Their philosphy is to garner votes through electoral bribes to their votebanks. People of UP were doing wishful thinking when they gave mandate , propelled by considerations other than ability to provide good governance. Situation cannot change unless votebank members understand the gameplan.

Good governance

ashok | 06-Feb-2013Reply | Forward
Naveen Patnaik and Nitish Kumar are bringing good governance to large, backward states, something which the Yadavs in UP and Mamata Banerjee in Bengal are not. When the next general election throws up a complex result, the CV will count for a lot in choosing the PM.

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below