Land bill in cabinet today, changes propose retrospective application

Comments print
Ravish Tiwari: New Delhi, Dec 13 2012, 03:18 IST
FP.jpg
Amendments to the contentious land acquisition Bill not only seek to hasten the acquisition process through tight time-schedules but also contain a provision that virtually allows the law to be applied retrospectively to cases that witnessed protests in the past.

The union cabinet is due to discuss the amendments to the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill on Thursday.

The changes suggest that the new law will be applicable to all ongoing land acquisition proceedings where “no award” has been made under the existing Land Acquisition Act, 1894. It also says the compensation package of the new law will apply even in cases where payments have been announced but possession of the land has not been taken or compensation has not been paid to the owner.

In a provision that could prove controversial, the amendments contain an explanation stressing that all cases where compensation has not been accepted or has been accepted under protest will be “deemed to be unpaid”.

The explanation also says that the compensation will be deemed paid only if it has been credited in the bank account of the land owner.

Another proposal in the amendments says all cases of acquisition will be deemed to have lapsed if possession of the land has not been taken or compensation not paid for at least five years before the new law comes into force even though a payment has been announced.

Top government sources said that the finance ministry objected to this provision during consultations in the Group of Ministers. The ministry is learnt

... contd.

Ads by Google
   1 | 2 | 3 | Next
Previous Story  UK stocks : European shares extend rally on easing macro worries Next Story  Sensex rebounds, up 66 points in early trade
Reader's Comments (2)| Post a Comment

Land Acquisition Bill

v.vijayamohan | 13-Dec-2012Reply | Forward
The Land acquisition Bill, when passed by Parliament, will clear number of hurdles that Industries, especially infrastructure industries are facing. Government must be magnanimous to the Land owners, who, in most cases, will be losing their sole source of livelihood and shelter. merely because the Industry has to pay more, land owners should not be left without livelihood. They must be paid sufficient compensation which enables them to live slightly better after selling the land and not worse. This principle of more than FAIR COMPENSATION must govern all such land acquisitions. Otherwise, trauma faced by these small landowners is too heavy for them to bear.

retrospective effect of land vull

PMGPillai | 13-Dec-2012Reply | Forward
dear editor, Any law effecting retrospectively must be given proper thught as once it comes into law the re[ercussions may be more than estimated hence proper analyzes must be caried out before enacting dated Thursday December 13th 2012 time 0445Hrs ist

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below