With the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) chiding banks for having been too lenient with borrowers and suggesting that they’re evergreening loans, banks now appear to be taking recast proposals more seriously. The R7,500-crore debt recast plan for Lanco Infratech has been put on hold with several lenders in the 27-bank consortium not comfortable with sanctioning additional loans.
Lanco Infratech, the construction arm of the Lanco Group, wants an additional R3,000 crore to be able to restart some of its operations. But lead banker IDBI Bank is dead against taking on more exposure to the infrastructure company as are others including Punjab National Bank and Dena Bank.
Their discomfort is understandable since Lanco’s finances are in a shambles. The firm reported a loss of R580 crore in the second quarter of this fiscal with sales falling 23% year-on-year to R2,451 crore; in the first quarter, the loss reported was R579 crore. With cash flows strained, consolidated net debt at the end of September had risen to a whopping R35,700 crore as its gearing hit 10X. One reason for this is the high receiveables at close to R3,000 crore, some of it from state electricity boards including those of Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh.
Credit Suisse expects the company to post losses in both FY14 and FY15 and believes that some power purchase agreements may have been wrongly priced. Under the circumstances, although the corporate debt restructuring (CDR) cell has called for details on why Lanco needs additional funds, it seems unlikely that banks will want to add to their exposure.
Lanco’s power plants have been starved for fuel. Both the Amarkantak-II and Kondapalli-II plants have been suffering, while the Udupi project operated at a plant load factor of 47% in the second quarter of this fiscal. And although the company has been talking of asset sales for more than a year now, it has met with little success. Bankers close to the development expressed concern that unless the company is able to restore some balance to the gearing by bringing in equity, it might be risky for lenders to take on more