Introduce English at later stage, says report on primary education

Comments print
Anubhuti Vishnoi: New Delhi, Nov 14 2012, 01:41 IST
FP.jpg
Should English be introduced as a medium of instruction in Class I? May be not, suggests a study on the teaching of English in government-run primary schools. Reason being that teaching of English in most government primary schools is no more than a teacher reading aloud from a textbook with no effort to develop listening or speaking skills in children, familiarising them with the rhythm and joy of poetry, contextualise grammar, or pay attention to learning gaps.

Policy planners need to ‘rethink’ about introduction of English as a medium of instruction from Class I, the study commissioned by the Union Human Resource Development Ministry said.

English has been introduced at the primary level in 27 states, it is a subject in Class I in 18 states, and the medium of instruction in Nagaland, Jammu and Kashmir, and government model schools of Chandigarh and Maharashtra. While the early introduction of the language is in response to people’s aspirations for quality education, experts opine that the language must be introduced at a relatively later stage and the mother tongue must be the medium of learning at primary level.

Conducted by the National Council of Educational Research & Training (NCERT), the study says, “Teachers in all the states/UT have fallen into what is called ‘the textbook trap’. The teachers and students were entirely dependent on the books.”

Most teachers begin their lessons by reading from textbooks, finish lessons abruptly, do not teach word/sentence patterns, resort to local languages and offer no opportunity to children to

... contd.

Ads by Google
   1 | 2 | Next
Previous Story  Review: Jab Tak Hai Jaan Next Story  Hostels their favourite place, IIT-B students want no curbs on visitors
Reader's Comments (1)| Post a Comment

So what else should we close down?

Prabhu Guptara | 14-Nov-2012Reply | Forward
If most of our teachers of English at Class 1 are not very good, should their teaching schools be improved or the teaching simply stopped? If a study of higher classes was done, we'll probably find that they aren't very good either, so I suppose we should close those too? And what about most of our high schools, colleges and universities???

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below