India's uphill battle against black money in real estate

Comments print
Agencies: Ulwe (Mumbai), Nov 21 2012, 12:12 IST
Indian economy.jpg
hope of a price correction that will help him afford a home for his family of five.

If the bill comes into force it might go some way in solving Kolhapure's problem.

The draft says developers will have to get accreditation for projects from the regulator, make public disclosure of details including the price of units, and maintain a separate bank account for each project to collect payments from buyers.

However, there is widespread cynicism about whether it can stamp out the practice given the belief that a large share of illicit money sloshing around the sector is tied to politicians.

There can't be a legal measure to put an end to black money ... because ultimately it ends up in the political cycle. That is where the requirement is, said a Mumbai-based income tax official who did not wish to be named.

Allegations last month of improper dealings between the son-in-law of ruling Congress party chief Sonia Gandhi and DLF , India's biggest property developer, underline the perception of a nexus between developers and politicians.

Activist group India Against Corruption accused DLF of arranging favourable loans and real estate transactions for Robert Vadra, a businessman married to Gandhi's daughter, who had previously announced a possible move into politics. The company and Vadra both deny wrongdoing.

CORRUPT OFFICIALS

Central bank rules prohibit bank loans to fund purchases of land, a regulation designed to curb speculation and reduce balance sheet risk for banks. To fill that void, wealthy individuals, including politicians, are widely believed to invest black money in

... contd.

Ads by Google
   Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
Previous Story  Euro zone, IMF fail to strike Greek deal Next Story  Pak issues Islamic trading mudaraba norms
Reader's Comments (1)| Post a Comment

Totally false claim

R.Ramachandran | 21-Nov-2012Reply | Forward
It is completely wrong to state that getting approvals pushes the cost. On the contrary, if the builders submit the plan according to the permissible limits of construction, and if they do not get the approval in time, they can very well approach legal fora for remedy. It is only due the builders trying to build beyond the permissible limits, that they have to shell out extra money to the babus. Even if a single window clearance system comes, then also so long as the builders would not confine to the permissible limits, the need to grease the palms will not be eliminated. On the contrary, the same amount of bribe may have to be paid, not at several places, but all at roof/window! The crux of the matter is the Government / politicians do not want to bell the cat! There are ample provisions in the Income Tax Act, (Chapter-XX-C - providing for purchase by Central Govt. of immovable properties in certain cases of transfer) but under disuse.

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below