India's uphill battle against black money in real estate

Comments print
Agencies: Ulwe (Mumbai), Nov 21 2012, 12:12 IST
Indian economy.jpg
regulation bill.

Designed to bring greater accountability, transparency and prevent fraud and delay, the bill proposes appointing the sector's first national regulator. However, it will not have control over land deals, which is where illicit activity is widely believed to be rampant.

The bill is not going to help solve the issue of black money, said Anurag Mathur, chief executive officer of project and development services at Jones Lang LaSalle.

Black money is tied in or shifted through land transactions and the regulator will have no jurisdiction over that.

TAX AVOIDANCE

In the year to June 2012, about $6 billion, or 30 percent of total transactions in the property sector, were executed using black money, according to Liases Foras, a consultancy.

Real estate accounts for more than a 10th of India's $1.85 trillion economy.

The government says black money, a term widely used in India to describe undeclared funds, often meant to avoid taxes, can be present in every stage of a project from land acquisition to home sales.

For the purchaser of a 5 million rupee home like those in Ulwe, a developer might typically ask for 1.5 million rupees in cash while making out a sales agreement for 3.5 million.

With banks willing to lend up to 75-85 percent of the official sale price, the buyer will then need to fund anything from 45 to 60 percent of the total cost from savings, which is difficult for many salaried, middle-income househunters.

It is unfair on the buyers, said Kolhapure, who has put his search on hold in the

... contd.

Ads by Google
   Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
Previous Story  Euro zone, IMF fail to strike Greek deal Next Story  Pak issues Islamic trading mudaraba norms
Reader's Comments (1)| Post a Comment

Totally false claim

R.Ramachandran | 21-Nov-2012Reply | Forward
It is completely wrong to state that getting approvals pushes the cost. On the contrary, if the builders submit the plan according to the permissible limits of construction, and if they do not get the approval in time, they can very well approach legal fora for remedy. It is only due the builders trying to build beyond the permissible limits, that they have to shell out extra money to the babus. Even if a single window clearance system comes, then also so long as the builders would not confine to the permissible limits, the need to grease the palms will not be eliminated. On the contrary, the same amount of bribe may have to be paid, not at several places, but all at roof/window! The crux of the matter is the Government / politicians do not want to bell the cat! There are ample provisions in the Income Tax Act, (Chapter-XX-C - providing for purchase by Central Govt. of immovable properties in certain cases of transfer) but under disuse.

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below