Brics and straws

Brics and straws

Brics Bank has its own limitations, and let us hope it will...
Much ado about execution

Much ado about execution

Effective delivery must be brought to the centre of policy-making...

Indian-origin law student sues Preet Bharara

Jul 25 2012, 16:08 IST
Comments 0
Indian-origin law student sues Preet Bharara Indian-origin law student sues Preet Bharara
SummaryBenula Bensam has sued Manhattan's top federal prosecutor & the US Justice Dept.

An Indian-origin law student has sued Manhattan's top federal prosecutor Preet Bharara and the US Justice Department claiming she was unlawfully questioned and her cell phone confiscated after she sent letters to the presiding judge during Rajat Gupta's insider trading trial.

24-year-old Benula Bensam, who regularly attended the trial of ex-McKinsey head Gupta, filed a 16-page lawsuit against Bharara, prosecutors Reed Brodsky, Richard Tarlowe and the US Marshals Service in US District Court here this month.

In the lawsuit she alleges that she was subjected to 'unreasonable search and seizure for unlawful stop, detention, interrogation, seizure of property, search of property, search of communications and demand for identification.' She is representing herself in the lawsuit.

Bensam had got into trouble during Gupta trial last month after she sent three letters to Judge Jed Rakoff on the case.

A law student at the Benjamin Cardozo School of Law, Bensam said she had taken a class on federal rules of evidence during her last semester and the letters to Rakoff focussed on the various evidentiary rulings he had made in the case and were not intended to influence him.

She said in the lawsuit that she wanted to 'understand the process of litigation' and intended to follow the case on a 'general level'.

“At no point had anyone informed me that I must not direct letters about the ongoing trial, or about the evidentiary rules or about any other matter to Judge Rakoff,” she said in the lawsuit, adding that “no executive agency may intercept or intervene in any way the communications to a member of the

judiciary on the subject of a trial.”

“It is not a crime for a disinterested party to write letters to a judge on the subject of a trial,” the lawsuit said.

“The US Marshals are to be held responsible for actions taken by court security officers for their role in the seizure of my phone,” Bensam said in the lawsuit.

She added that Bharara as well as the prosecutors in the Gupta case had “instigated the involvement of the US Marshals”.

During one of the court proceedings in June, Bensam was escorted out of the courtroom by US Marshals and questioned over the letters she had sent to the judge.

Marshals questioned her at length and refused to return her cell phone saying she could get it back only after she had answered all their questions, she said.

The Marshals also attempted to take her

Single Page Format
Ads by Google

More from Latest News

Reader´s Comments
| Post a Comment
Please Wait while comments are loading...