Final SAT hearing in Sahara case today

Mar 23 2013, 03:29 IST
Comments 0
SummaryThe Securities Appellate Tribunal will begin on Saturday the final hearing on a plea by Sahara chief Subrata Roy against market regulator Sebi's attachment order on his bank accounts and other assets, along with those of two group firms and their top executives.

The Securities Appellate Tribunal will begin on Saturday the final hearing on a plea by Sahara chief Subrata Roy against market regulator Sebi's attachment order on his bank accounts and other assets, along with those of two group firms and their top executives.

The matter relates to a Supreme Court direction ordering refund of more than R24,000 crore of investors' money raised by two Sahara group firms — Sahara India Real Estate Corp and Sahara Housing Investment — through issue of bonds, wherein Sebi has been asked to facilitate the refund.

After expiry of the court-set deadline for the refund, Sebi last month issued attachment orders against the two firms and their top executives, including Subrata Roy.

Roy has approached the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) against the attachment orders and the plea has been posted by the SAT for "final hearing" on Saturday.

After hearing both the sides on March 12, SAT Presiding Officer PK Malhotra had said the matter would be taken up for disposal expeditiously and posted the matter for final hearing on March 23. He had, however, refused any interim relief. "The final hearing will be in Mumbai on March 23, 2013. In view of the early hearing granted, we do not consider it necessary to pass any interim order...," Malhotra had said.

In its latest order in this long-running case, Sebi last week said the companies have not complied with the Supreme Court orders and therefore it was compelled to pass the attachment orders.

During the last hearing, the Sahara counsel had sought interim relief for industrialist Subrata Roy Sahara whose bank accounts have also been ordered to be frozen. The counsel submitted that SAT should at least give an interim relief by directing to de-freeze Roy's accounts. However, Sebi counsel had argued that there was no need for interim relief in the case.

Ads by Google

More from Corporates & Markets

Reader´s Comments
| Post a Comment
Please Wait while comments are loading...