Filing of I-T returns obligatory even after tax payment
Ruling in favour of the income tax department in a batch of six cases led by Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax versus M/s AR Enterprises, the Supreme Court held that payment of advance tax by an assessee would not, by itself, amount to disclosure of income. Even mere deduction of tax at source (TDS) could not be taken as disclosure of income, it said while quashing the Madras High Courtís judgment that ruled contrary to its views.
During the course of search at the premises of another concern AR Mercantile Pvt Ltd in 1996, certain books and documents pertaining to the assessee (AR Enterprises) were seized. On scrutiny, the assessing officer found that though the assessee had taxable income for the assessment year 1995-96, no return of income had been filed till the date of search. The assessee, after filing return for the block period (ten years preceding the previous year), which covered assessment years 1993-96, objected to the departmentís action under Section 158BD of the Income Tax Act, saying for assessment year 1995-96, advance tax had already been paid and, therefore, income for that period could not be deemed to be undisclosed.
While the department rejected AR Enterprisesí claim, the sectoral tribunal favoured the assessee. On appeal by the Revenue, the Madras High Court also agreed with the assessee. Reversing the HC view, the apex court stated that advance tax and TDS deduction did not amount to disclosure of income. ďSince TDS is computed on
Be the first to comment.