FE Editorial : Who値l blink first?

Dec 07 2012, 02:12 IST
Comments 0
SummaryWith a newly-emboldened President Obama unwilling to let the mildly-chastened Republicans push him around any more, the news coming out of Washington is getting scary, and the $600 billion fiscal cliff預 combination of cuts in federal spending and elimination of tax breaks葉hat will push the US into a recession looks increasingly probable next month.

With a newly-emboldened President Obama unwilling to let the mildly-chastened Republicans push him around any more, the news coming out of Washington is getting scary, and the $600 billion fiscal cliff預 combination of cuts in federal spending and elimination of tax breaks葉hat will push the US into a recession looks increasingly probable next month. Both sides began from where they壇 left off before the elections. President Obama largely repeated his earlier $1.6 trillion proposal to tax the rich and raising dividend/capital-gains/inheritance taxes ($960 billion) and cut tax loopholes ($600 billion) while the Republicans began with a call to cut $2.2 trillion of entitlements (primarily in Medicare and Social Security). While the Republicans have climbed down a little and are now offering revenue increases of $800 billion through reductions of tax loopholes, they池e sticking to their Tea Party stance of never raising taxes. Understandably, an Obama who was pushed into a corner by the Republicans through much of his first tenure預nd even had to suffer the ignominy of a debt ceiling crisis and even an S&P downgrade庸eels he痴 had enough. And while, given his sweeping victory, he may be right in thinking the electorate will blame the Republicans for the fiscal cliff, he could be gambling with the US economy, indeed the global economy.

Apart from the fact that raising taxes in a slowing economy is not always a sure thing, the evidence on hand should give Obama pause. As of December 3, according to Reuters BreakingViews, a total of 144 US firms have announced Q4 special dividends of $21.4 billion耀ome like retailing firm Costco are even borrowing money to pay the dividends擁n order to take advantage of the current 15% dividend tax versus a possible 39.6% rate next year. Based on the dividends announced so far, assuming next year痴 dividend tax goes up to 39.6%, that痴 a potential annualised tax loss of over $20 billion next year just on account of the dividend jumping. BreakingViews columnist Daniel Indiviglio has an interesting take on the outline of a possible tax compromise. While raising taxes on American earning more than $200,000 would affect 2.4 million taxpayers, Indiviglio points out, raising this to $1 million will take 2.1 million taxpayers out of the net while reducing the potential tax collections by just a third. Surely that痴 a compromise worth looking at? While the Republicans clearly need to rethink their strategy, especially in an America whose social structure is changing dramatically, President Obama would do well to show some flexibility as well. Falling off the fiscal cliff can稚 be a great idea, even if voters think John Boehner pushed him.

Ads by Google

More from Edit & Columns

Reader´s Comments
| Post a Comment
Please Wait while comments are loading...