FE Editorial : The Raghuram rubric

The Financial Express

Posted: Thursday, Nov 05, 2009 at 2221 hrs IST
Updated: Thursday, Nov 05, 2009 at 2221 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss

: The issue of consolidation in the banking sector, particularly in the context of public sector banks, has cropped up once again, with reported differences emerging between the PM’s honorary economic advisor, Raghuram Rajan, and the finance ministry. Rajan, in a letter to the PM, has advised the government against driving consolidation in the banking sector because the difficulties associated with the consolidation of banks are often under-estimated. He says that any final decision should be left to individual bank boards. Earlier, Rajan, as chairman of a committee on financial sector reforms, had supported the consolidation of banks as long as it did not kill competition and increase concentration. The finance minister, on the other hand, wants a push towards consolidation. In a way, both the finance minister and Rajan have valid points. The finance minister is right in arguing that consolidation among public sector banks will help strengthen and improve their efficiency. If Indian banks are to be globally competitive, scaling up is an essential requirement. So, consolidation should not be opposed on principle. However, Rajan is right in insisting that bank boards should take the final call. The government should certainly not interfere with their decision, whether in favour of or against consolidation. SBI has ironically been trying to acquire a number of subsidiaries, but has faced objections from the government.

The real differences between Raghuram Rajan and the finance ministry are probably not on consolidation in banking—there is quite a lot in common on this particular issue. The real differences are on the numerous reforms of the financial sector that the Raghuram Rajan Committee had suggested and which the finance ministry and RBI now want to put on the backburner. The government and RBI seem to have all but rejected the idea of an inflation-targeting central bank. For the moment, there is no appetite for reducing government shareholding in banks to below 50%. There seems no inclination to further liberalise government securities and corporate bonds to foreign institutional investments. Obviously, there has been a dramatic change in the global context since the Rajan Committee submitted its report. The global consensus seems inclined to caution on finance. However, it would be a grave mistake for the government and RBI to completely reject the recommendations made by the Rajan Committee. Finance in India is so underdeveloped that we don’t have to worry about a Western style crisis for a while longer....

More from Edit & Column

Single Page Format 1 - 2 - Next
Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
» Collective wisdom should prevail
Posted by Dr B Sundara on 2009-11-05 09:43:35.587748+05:30
Common sense says that for effective and healthy competition among the public sector banks, consolidation (merger) of banks is not desirable. Of course non-performing ones may be merged with some better performers. Cheap and hassle-free finance for fast growing economy no doubt would be a necessity. Consolidation may also breed inefficiency and there could be manpower management issues. When you have appointed an advisor, there is reason to take his advice seriously. There were instances of appointing committees to suggest reforms of various organizations and such committees doing justice by suggesting some very good measures for improvement. But when the question of incorporating such measures comes up, powerful bureaucrats with vested interest brush aside the recommendations and carry on as usual. Whole exercise becomes a waste. Now in the case of banking sector reform, collective wisdom should prevail for overall improvement.

Express Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you