The drop in the State Bank of India’s (SBI) net interest income (NII) by 3% yoy, in the three months to December 2012, the first such fall in a long time, is an indication of a trying environment in which loan yields are falling and credit costs continue to rise. Even if one adjusts for the loss of interest on the pension funds that have been transferred out to a trust, the increase in the NII is insignificant. With the top line under pressure, the bank was able to grow profits by just 4% yoy to R3,396 crore and that too by compromising on provisioning. SBI provided just R2,766 crore for loan losses, down 8% yoy, which seems somewhat conservative, as does the provision coverage ratio, which dropped to 61.5%, the lowest in five quarters. It’s perplexing that SBI doesn’t want to provide more aggressively since the bank’s asset quality continues to deteriorate; in the three months to December, gross non-performing assets (NPAs) rose sequentially to 5.3% from 4.61% a year ago and now amount to a fairly large R53,000 crore. Moreover, there were restructured assets to the tune of R2,838 crore to contend with, and while these may have been lower sequentially, there is little respite from slippages—a high R8,165 crore this time around and in keeping with the run rate clocked in recent quarters. Since it doesn’t look like the economy has bottomed out yet, which means it’s possible more assets could turn toxic or more loans could be recast, one would have expected a lot more caution. Especially since there is likely to be a heavy dose of restructuring next quarter ahead of the tightened provisioning norms starting April 2013.
Meanwhile, business at SBI was fairly brisk during the December quarter and the 25-basis-point cut in base rates last September seems to have paid off, with the bank able to attract more corporate accounts. However, the pressure on yields could persist as loans are re-priced downwards but banks get virtually no relief on the liabilities side since they’re unable to drop interest rates on deposits—in SBI’s case,